Real-world outcomes in patients with hereditary angioedema prescribed lanadelumab versus other prophylaxis

Background: Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare genetic disorder characterized by painful, debilitating, and potentially fatal swelling attacks. Lanadelumab is approved as long-term prophylaxis (LTP) in patients with HAE. However, real-world data on LTP use in patients with HAE are limited. Objective: To describe clinical characteristics, attack history, and quality of life (QoL) of patients with HAE type I/II who were receiving lanadelumab or other LTPs. Methods: Data were drawn from the Adelphi HAE Disease Specific Program, a cross-sectional survey of HAE physicians conducted in the United States from July to November 2021. Physician-reported disease characteristics, HAE attack frequency, and QoL were compared among patients receiving lanadelumab or other LTPs for at least 12 months. Results: Physicians reported data for 144 patients, of whom 29 had received lanadelumab and 115 had received another prophylaxis for at least 12 months. The mean ± standard deviation number of attacks in the previous 12 months was lower among patients receiving lanadelumab than other LTPs (2.3 ± 3.1 versus 3.4 ± 2.8, respectively; p = 0.075). Although both groups had similar current disease activity and severity, more patients receiving lanadelumab versus other LTPs had high disease activity (51.7% versus 12.5%, respectively; p < 0.0001) and disease severity rated as severe (51.7% versus 16.1%, respectively; p = 0.0001) at diagnosis. Physicians reported that more patients who received lanadelumab had good or very good QoL (72.4%) than those receiving other LTPs (36.5%) (p = 0.003). Conclusion: Analysis of these findings suggests lower attack frequency, lower symptomatic impact, and better QoL in patients treated with lanadelumab than another prophylaxis in a real-world setting.