Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Working Memory01:24

Working Memory

145
Working memory refers to a combination of components, including short-term memory and attention, that allow an individual to hold information temporarily as we perform cognitive tasks. It is an essential cognitive function that enables the execution of complex tasks such as problem-solving, comprehension, and reasoning. Unlike short-term memory, which simply involves the storage of information for a brief period, working memory involves the active manipulation and processing of this...
145
Sensory Memory01:14

Sensory Memory

174
Sensory memory captures information from the environment in its original form for a very brief duration, just long enough to be exposed to visual, auditory, and other senses. This type of memory is detailed and rich but quickly lost unless certain strategies are employed to transfer it into short-term or long-term memory. Sensory information is continuously bombarding the human brain, yet only a small fraction is absorbed, as most of it does not significantly impact daily life. For instance,...
174
Parallel Processing01:20

Parallel Processing

145
The brain processes sensory information rapidly due to parallel processing, which involves sending data across multiple neural pathways at the same time. This method allows the brain to manage various sensory qualities, such as shapes, colors, movements, and locations, all concurrently. For instance, when observing a forest landscape, the brain simultaneously processes the movement of leaves, the shapes of trees, the depth between them, and the various shades of green. This enables a quick and...
145
Motor and Sensory Areas of the Cortex01:14

Motor and Sensory Areas of the Cortex

3.3K
The cerebral cortex, the brain's outermost layer, is pivotal in processing complex cognitive tasks, emotions, and various sensory inputs and executing voluntary motor activities. This intricate structure is divided into three primary functional areas: the motor areas, sensory areas, and association areas.
Motor Areas
The motor areas located in the frontal lobe are central to controlling voluntary movements. This region is further subdivided into the primary motor cortex and the premotor...
3.3K
Somatosensory, Motor, and Association Cortex01:24

Somatosensory, Motor, and Association Cortex

432
The somatosensory cortex in the parietal lobes is crucial for interpreting sensory data such as touch, temperature, and proprioception. The somatosensory cortex, situated in the parietal lobes, plays a vital role in interpreting sensory information like touch, temperature, and proprioception—awareness of body position. This specialized brain region features an organized structure wherein neurons at the top primarily process sensations originating from the lower body. In contrast, those at...
432
Understanding Memory01:19

Understanding Memory

268
Memory is the retention of information or experiences over time, facilitated through three main processes: encoding, storage, and retrieval. Encoding is the process of inputting information into the memory system. For instance, when listening to a lecture, watching a play, reading a book, or having a conversation, the brain is actively encoding information. This initial stage involves transforming sensory input into a form that can be processed and stored by the brain. Various factors, such as...
268

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Brain targeting and trafficking of extracellular vesicles in central nervous system diseases: a therapeutic roadmap.

Nanomedicine (London, England)·2026
Same author

Growth Dynamics of selected Vibrio spp. in mono-, co-culture and multi-bacterial microcosms: Investigating the prevalence of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in seawater.

Marine environmental research·2026
Same author

Collagen nanofiber reinforced alginate hydrogel tube microbioreactors for cell culture.

Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology·2026
Same author

Domain-specific adaptations in visual working memory: differentiated performance profiles between open- and closed-skill athletes.

Physiology & behavior·2026
Same author

Emerging blood-based diagnostic strategies for tuberculosis.

Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine·2026
Same author

The intravenous targeted nanopeptide, CAQK, is neuroprotective and improves motor function after spinal cord injury in rats.

The journal of trauma and acute care surgery·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 12, 2025

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking
05:58

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

8.8K

Multisensory working memory capture of attention.

Lei Xu1, Biye Cai1,2, Chunlin Yue3

  • 1Department of Psychology, Research Center for Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, Soochow University, Suzhou, China.

Attention, Perception & Psychophysics
|September 18, 2024
PubMed
Summary

Multisensory interactions reduce attentional capture by working memory (WM) during visual search. This suggests enhanced cognitive control, improving search performance by suppressing distractors rather than boosting target capture.

Keywords:
Attentional captureCognitive controlMultisensory interactionVisual searchWorking memory

More Related Videos

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control
09:37

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Published on: July 5, 2015

9.0K
Mapping Cortical Dynamics Using Simultaneous MEG/EEG and Anatomically-constrained Minimum-norm Estimates: an Auditory Attention Example
08:45

Mapping Cortical Dynamics Using Simultaneous MEG/EEG and Anatomically-constrained Minimum-norm Estimates: an Auditory Attention Example

Published on: October 24, 2012

14.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 12, 2025

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking
05:58

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

8.8K
Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control
09:37

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Published on: July 5, 2015

9.0K
Mapping Cortical Dynamics Using Simultaneous MEG/EEG and Anatomically-constrained Minimum-norm Estimates: an Auditory Attention Example
08:45

Mapping Cortical Dynamics Using Simultaneous MEG/EEG and Anatomically-constrained Minimum-norm Estimates: an Auditory Attention Example

Published on: October 24, 2012

14.6K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Human-Computer Interaction

Background:

  • Working memory (WM) representations guide attention in visual search.
  • Multisensory interactions are known to benefit WM and visual search.
  • The specific impact of multisensory input on attentional capture by WM remains unclear.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether multisensory interactions influence attentional capture driven by working memory (WM).
  • To compare attentional capture effects under visual-only versus audiovisual WM conditions during a dual-task paradigm.

Main Methods:

  • A dual-task paradigm combining visual search and a WM task.
  • Manipulation of memory modality in the WM task (visual vs. audiovisual).
  • Analysis of attentional capture effects and response time (RT) costs and benefits.

Main Results:

  • Memory-driven attentional capture occurred in both visual and audiovisual conditions.
  • Audiovisual conditions showed weaker capture effects and RT costs compared to visual-only.
  • RT benefits were similar across visual and audiovisual conditions.

Conclusions:

  • Multisensory interactions enhance cognitive control, improving visual search performance.
  • Cognitive control appears to suppress attentional capture by distractors more than enhance capture by targets.
  • Findings provide novel insights into how multisensory input modulates attentional capture by WM.