Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 12, 2025

Supramaximal Intensity Hypoxic Exercise and Vascular Function Assessment in Mice
Published on: March 15, 2019
Ventilatory and Perceived Ergogenic Effects of Mandibular Forward Repositioning During Running at Maximal Oxygen
Filipa Cardoso1,2, Mário J Costa1,2, Paulo Colaço1,2
1Center of Research, Education, Innovation and Intervention in Sport, CIFI2D, Faculty of Sport, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Abstract:
Cardoso, F, Costa, MJ, Colaço, P, Vilas-Boas, JP, Pinho, JC, Pyne, DB, and Fernandes, RJ. Ventilatory and perceived ergogenic effects of mandibular forward repositioning during running at maximal oxygen uptake intensity. J Strength Cond Res 39(1): e13-e19, 2025-Wearing an intraoral dental splint may enhance ventilatory function and exercise performance. Nineteen runners performed on a 400-m outdoor track: (a) an incremental protocol to assess the velocity at maximal oxygen uptake (vV̇ o2 max) and (b) 2 square wave bouts wearing 2 intraoral splints (with and without mandibular forward repositioning). The time until exhaustion at vV̇ o2 max (TLimv V̇ o2 max), ventilatory variables, oxygen uptake (V̇ o2 ) kinetics, energetic profiling, perceived exertion and kinematics, were all measured. Ventilatory data were assessed breath-by-breath and perceived exertion evaluated using the Borg 6-20-point scale at the end of TLimv V̇ o2 max bouts. Images were recorded by video cameras (120 Hz) and kinematic measures retrieved using Kinovea. A paired t test was computed for comparison of splints ( p ≤ 0.05). With (vs. without) mandibular forward repositioning, runners increased their TLimv V̇ o2 max by ∼6% ( p = 0.03), coupled with higher ventilation (151 ± 22 vs. 147 ± 23 L·min -1 , p = 0.04), end-tidal oxygen tension (114.3 ± 3.7 vs. 112.9 ± 3.9 mm Hg, p = 0.003), and lower inspiratory time (0.526 ± 0.083 vs. 0.540 ± 0.090 seconds, p = 0.02), despite similar V̇ o2 kinetics (e.g., 49.0 ± 8.7 vs. 47.7 ± 8.6 ml∙kg∙min -1 of fast component amplitude) being observed. The energy expenditure was ∼8% higher ( p = 0.03) with the mandible forward, coupled with lower perceived exertion scores ( p = 0.04). Mandibular forward repositioning was effective in acutely improving running performance at vV̇ o2 max with ergogenic effects on ventilatory and perceived variables.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Respiratory Capacities
One key metric is the Inspiratory Capacity (IC), which represents the maximum amount of air that can be inhaled with full effort. IC is calculated by summing the tidal volume and inspiratory reserve volume, typically ranging from 2.4 to 3.6 liters.
The Functional Residual Capacity (FRC) represents the air in the...
Hyperpnea and Hyperventilation
Factors Affecting Pulmonary Ventilation
Alveolar Surface Tension
The alveolar fluid lines the luminal surface of the alveoli and exerts a force called surface tension. This force is caused by the polar water molecules in the liquid being more strongly attracted to each...
Physiological Control of Respiration
Breathing, a seemingly passive process, is regulated by the respiratory center in the brainstem. This center coordinates the involuntary control of respirations, which means it occurs without conscious effort, ensuring a smooth and uninterrupted pattern.
Regulation of Ventilation
The body maintains ventilation by monitoring levels of carbon dioxide (CO2), oxygen (O2), and hydrogen ion concentration (pH) in the arterial blood. Among these factors, the level of CO2 plays a crucial...
Exercise and Cardiac Output
Sustained exercise increases the muscles' oxygen demand, which can be...
Pulmonary Ventilation: Inhalation
Boyle's law becomes particularly pertinent when examining respiratory...

