"Social science is explanation or it is nothing." Introduction to a debate.

Area of Science:

• Social Sciences
• Anthropology
• Sociology

Background:

• The essay stems from a debate at the London School of Economics on "Social Science is Explanation or it is Nothing."
• It references the historical "Group for Theoretical Debates in Anthropology," known for identifying engaging topics for anthropologists.
• The context involves a shift beyond the traditional "is sociology a science?" debate.

Purpose of the Study:

• To introduce contributions documenting and extending a debate on the nature and purpose of social science explanation.
• To explore the affordances of academic debates as a form of scholarly engagement.
• To discuss the contributions of social sciences in light of advancements in science and technology studies and theory-method exchanges.

Main Methods:

• The study is primarily a conceptual and discursive essay.
• It analyzes the historical context of theoretical debates in anthropology.
• It engages with the proposition "Social Science is Explanation or it is Nothing" through critical discussion.

Main Results:

• The debate highlights the significance of "explanation" as a core function of social science.
• Academic debates are valuable for fostering interdisciplinary engagement and critical inquiry.
• Contemporary social science is moving beyond older ontological questions about its scientific status.

Conclusions:

• The proposition "Social Science is Explanation or it is Nothing" serves as a catalyst for discussing the field's contributions.
• Interdisciplinary dialogue and the integration of theory and method are crucial for the advancement of social sciences.
• The essay advocates for a nuanced understanding of social science's role, informed by its explanatory power and engagement with broader scientific discourse.