Receiving a Pathogenic Variant in a Population Breast Cancer Screening Trial: A Mixed Method Study
Leslie Riddle1, Jennifer Elyse James2, Arash Naeim3
1Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, UCSF, San Francisco, California, USA.
Public Health Genomics
|September 22, 2024
Summary
Participants in the WISDOM trial receiving genetic results for breast cancer risk reported varied preparedness. Most shared results with relatives, with higher communication rates for high-risk findings, aiding cascade testing.
Area of Science:
- Genetics
- Oncology
- Public Health
Background:
- Risk-based breast cancer screening is crucial for reducing high morbidity and mortality.
- The Women Informed to Screen Depending on Measures of Risk (WISDOM) trial investigated participant experiences with genomic results.
Purpose of the Study:
- To examine the experiences of WISDOM trial participants who received pathogenic variants in breast cancer genes.
- To understand participant preparedness, result sharing, and cascade testing following genomic risk assessment.
Main Methods:
- Surveys were administered immediately post-disclosure (n=181) and one year later.
- Qualitative interviews (n=42) were conducted at two time points (2-4 weeks and 6 months).
- Statistical comparisons were made between risk groups; qualitative data elaborated on survey findings.
Main Results:
- 66.3% felt prepared for genomic results; 80.7% shared results with relatives initially, rising to 88.4% by T2.
- Reasons for sharing included providing information and encouraging cascade testing.
- High-risk participants showed increased communication with relatives, providers, and higher rates of cascade testing.
Conclusions:
- Most participants shared results with family and providers, aligning with risk levels.
- Challenges remain in preparing individuals for pathogenic results and ensuring accessible follow-up care.
- Facilitating genetic counseling and cascade testing is essential within population risk-based screening programs.
Related Concept Videos
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
Cancer Survival Analysis
Cancer survival analysis focuses on quantifying and interpreting the time from a key starting point, such as diagnosis or the initiation of treatment, to a specific endpoint, such as remission or death. This analysis provides critical insights into treatment effectiveness and factors that influence patient outcomes, helping to shape clinical decisions and guide prognostic evaluations. A cornerstone of oncology research, survival analysis tackles the challenges of skewed, non-normally...


