Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Statistical Software for Data Analysis and Clinical Trials01:12

Statistical Software for Data Analysis and Clinical Trials

509
Statistical software is pivotal in data analysis and clinical trials by providing tools to analyze data, draw conclusions, and make predictions. These software packages range from simple data management applications to complex analytical platforms, supporting various statistical tests, models, and simulation techniques. Their significance lies in their ability to handle vast amounts of data with precision and efficiency, enabling researchers to validate hypotheses, identify trends, and make...
509
Clinical Trials01:16

Clinical Trials

6.6K
Clinical trials are prospective experimental studies conducted on humans to determine the safety and efficacy of treatments, drugs, diet methods, and medical devices. Using statistics in clinical trials enables researchers to derive reasonable and accurate conclusions from the collected data, allowing them to make wise decisions in uncertain situations. In medical research, statistical methods are crucial for preventing errors and bias.
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
6.6K
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model01:15

Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model

561
The case management model is a multidisciplinary approach that involves healthcare professionals from diverse disciplines, such as physicians, nurses, therapists, social workers, and pharmacists, working collaboratively to address the various needs of patients. Each healthcare professional brings unique expertise and perspectives, contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of the patient's condition and tailoring treatment plans accordingly.
For example, a patient with a chronic...
561
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

83
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
83
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

124
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
124
Hazard Ratio01:12

Hazard Ratio

92
The hazard ratio (HR) is a widely used measure in clinical trials to compare the risk of events, such as death or disease recurrence, between two groups over time. It reflects the ratio of hazard rates—the instantaneous risk of the event occurring—between a treatment group and a control group. This measure provides valuable insights into the relative effectiveness of a treatment by assessing how the risk of an event differs between the two groups.
For example, in a clinical trial...
92

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Comparative effects of drugs for adults with overweight or obesity: systematic review and network meta-analysis.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2026
Same author

SAGES systematic review and meta-analysis for the management of symptomatic walled-off pancreatic necrosis.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
Same author

Reporting Interest-Holder Engagement in Practice Guidelines: The RIGHT-MuSE Checklist.

Annals of internal medicine·2026
Same author

Characterizing updated and living meta-analyses Part 1: A methodological scoping review on methods for conducting meta-analyses in updated and living systematic reviews.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same author

Adapting Evidence-Based Practice Guidelines for Sedation, Analgesia, Withdrawal, and Delirium Assessment and Management in Critically Ill Children.

Critical care research and practice·2026
Same author

Toward a definition of a core outcome set in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: a scoping review protocol.

JBI evidence synthesis·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 12, 2025

A Clinical Metaproteomics Workflow Implemented within Galaxy Bioinformatics Platform to Analyze Host-Microbiome Interactions Underlying Human Disease
09:52

A Clinical Metaproteomics Workflow Implemented within Galaxy Bioinformatics Platform to Analyze Host-Microbiome Interactions Underlying Human Disease

Published on: January 10, 2025

512

Network meta-analysis: a powerful tool for clinicians, decision-makers, and methodologists.

Ivan D Florez1, Juan E De La Cruz-Mena2, Areti-Angeliki Veroniki3

  • 1Department of Pediatrics, University of Antioquia, Medellin, Colombia; Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Clínica Las Américas-AUNA, Medellin, Colombia; School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
|September 22, 2024
PubMed
Summary

Network Meta-analysis (NMA) combines direct and indirect evidence to compare multiple treatments, aiding clinical decision-making when direct comparisons are unavailable. This advanced statistical method provides precise comparative effectiveness estimates and intervention hierarchies.

Keywords:
GRADEIncoherenceIntransitivityMeta-analysisMultiple treatment comparisonsNetwork meta-analysisSUCRATreatment ranking

More Related Videos

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases
05:02

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases

Published on: October 24, 2019

31.2K
Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

451

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 12, 2025

A Clinical Metaproteomics Workflow Implemented within Galaxy Bioinformatics Platform to Analyze Host-Microbiome Interactions Underlying Human Disease
09:52

A Clinical Metaproteomics Workflow Implemented within Galaxy Bioinformatics Platform to Analyze Host-Microbiome Interactions Underlying Human Disease

Published on: January 10, 2025

512
Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases
05:02

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases

Published on: October 24, 2019

31.2K
Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

451

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Health Services Research
  • Clinical Epidemiology

Background:

  • Network Meta-analysis (NMA) integrates direct and indirect evidence to estimate comparative treatment effectiveness.
  • NMAs are valuable when direct head-to-head trials are lacking or limited.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To summarize key concepts for clinicians and methodologists using NMA.
  • To guide informed decision-making through understanding NMA principles.

Main Methods:

  • The article outlines the fundamental concepts of Network Meta-analysis.
  • Focuses on the synthesis of direct and indirect comparative evidence.

Main Results:

  • NMAs yield network estimates for intervention comparisons.
  • Provides more precise estimates than direct comparisons alone.
  • Establishes hierarchies for multiple interventions for the same indication.

Conclusions:

  • Network Meta-analysis is a powerful tool for comparative effectiveness research.
  • Understanding NMA concepts is crucial for effective application in clinical and methodological contexts.