Dietary fats and cancer

The mono-unsaturated non-essential fatty acid oleic acid (OA) has been shown to stimulate malignant cell proliferation in culture significantly. In contrast, the essential fatty acids (EFAs) linoleic acid (LA) and alpha-linolenic acid (ALA) and their longer chain metabolic derivatives have been shown to have potent proliferation suppressive effects on malignant cells in culture. OA is normally synthesized in the body and present in most vegetable oils and therefore also in most experimental polyunsaturated fatty acid diets used for assessing the effects of dietary fatty acids on tumorigenesis in rats. Dietary OA could therefore specifically account for the general observation that diets containing polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) are tumorigenic (1). It has been repeatedly demonstrated that many EFAs and EFA metabolites suppress proliferation of a wide range of malignant cells in culture. These cytotoxic effects of EFAs do not inhibit the proliferation of nonmalignant cultured cells. The EFAs which have proliferation-suppression activities are components of cell membranes and many are also eicosanoid precursors. It is proposed that the membranes of malignant cells are inherently unstable. Thus the EFAs may have effects which either fluidise or stabilise these membranes. This results in either cytolysis or inhibition of proliferation. The relative quantities of the different EFAs may be critical for these effects. Eicosanoid metabolites may further compound these actions. It is suggested that one pathway for these actions could be a metabolic imbalance of EFA metabolites and their eicosanoid products. This would arise due to a combination of inhibited desaturase enzymes and a concomitant free cellular supply of dietary arachidonic acid (AA). This imbalance also could be causally involved in the promotion of malignancy. A simple procedure, which only involves dietary supplementation with gamma-linolenic acid (GLA) and eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), is proposed as prophylaxis against the possible tumorigenic effect of dietary fats. "By some estimates, as much as 90% of all cancer in humans has been attributed to various environmental factors, including diet. The evidence reviewed by the committee suggests that cancers of most of the major sites are influenced by dietary patterns. The committee concluded that of all the dietary components it studied, the combined epidemiological and experimental evidence is most suggestive for a causal relationship between fat intake and the occurrence of cancer" - (1).