Anal Cancer Screening Practices Among Higher-Risk Populations in an Academic Medical System

Although some experts recommend anal cancer screening for disproportionally affected populations including people living with HIV (PWH), condyloma acuminata, human papillomavirus-associated gynecologic dysplasia and cancers, and solid organ transplants, actual screening practices remain understudied. Our objective was to characterize anal cancer screening practices among higher-risk populations in an academic medical system with access to high-resolution anoscopy.

We extracted outpatient clinical data for the aforementioned populations from January 1, 2015, to August 1, 2022, at 3 sites of an academic medical system. Data included patients' demographics, medical comorbidities, and anal cytology and human papillomavirus testing results. We used χ2 tests and logistic regression to assess for associations between patient characteristics and anal cancer screening.

Of 7654 patients, 6.3% received anal cytology screening at least once including 21.7% of PWH, 13.8% of people with condyloma acuminata, 1.1% of people with gynecologic cancers, and 0.5% of people with solid organ transplants. In multivariable analysis, Black patients were 46% less likely to receive screening than White patients (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.40-0.71), and cisgender women were 73% less likely to receive screening than cisgender men (95% confidence interval, 0.20-0.38). Of 485 individuals who received anal cytology screening, 37.5% were only screened once and 70.5% had abnormal cytology on one or more screenings.

Only one-fifth of PWH received anal cancer screening, and other higher-risk populations had even lower screening rates. Black patients and women were also less likely to be screened. Strategies to improve equitable screening practices for anal cancer are needed.