Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 12, 2025

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
Published on: June 3, 2013
Detecting Careless Responding in Multidimensional Forced-Choice Questionnaires
Rebekka Kupffer1, Susanne Frick2,3, Eunike Wetzel1
1University of Kaiserslautern-Landau, Germany.
Abstract:
The multidimensional forced-choice (MFC) format is an alternative to rating scales in which participants rank items according to how well the items describe them. Currently, little is known about how to detect careless responding in MFC data. The aim of this study was to adapt a number of indices used for rating scales to the MFC format and additionally develop several new indices that are unique to the MFC format. We applied these indices to a data set from an online survey (N = 1,169) that included a series of personality questionnaires in the MFC format. The correlations among the careless responding indices were somewhat lower than those published for rating scales. Results from a latent profile analysis suggested that the majority of the sample (about 76-84%) did not respond carelessly, although the ones who did were characterized by different levels of careless responding. In a simulation study, we simulated different careless responding patterns and varied the overall proportion of carelessness in the samples. With one exception, the indices worked as intended conceptually. Taken together, the results suggest that careless responding also plays an important role in the MFC format. Recommendations on how it can be addressed are discussed.
Related Concept Videos
McNemar's Test
Response Surface Methodology
The process of RSM involves several key steps:
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test
Cochran's Q Test
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks
The Availability Heuristic

