Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 12, 2025

Spatial Temporal Analysis of Fieldwise Flow in Microvasculature
Published on: November 18, 2019
Quantification of Video Sequences of the Microcirculation: A Comparison Between Automated Analysis Using Analysis
Fabian Müller-Graf1,2, Dominik Wrede1, Lena Bork1
1Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, University Medical Center Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Objective:
Microcirculatory disturbances can contribute to organ dysfunction in patients undergoing major surgeries and critical illness. Incident dark field imaging (CytoCam, Braedius Medical BV, Huizen, Netherlands) provides direct visualization of the microcirculation. To utilize this method in daily clinical practice, automated image analysis is essential. This study aims to compare the automated analysis of recorded microcirculation video sequences using CytoCamTools V2 Analysis Manager (Braedius Medical BV) with established manual analysis using Capillary Mapper (Version 1.4.5, University Hospital Münster, Germany) as reference method.
Methods:
Sublingual microcirculation video sequences were recorded in patients undergoing laparotomy at four time points (before surgery, 2 and 6 h after surgery, and on the first postoperative day) using incident dark field imaging. Agreement between automated and manual analysis of total vessel density (TVD), perfused vessel density (PVD), and proportion of perfused vessels (PPV) was compared using intraclass correlation (ICC) and Bland-Altman method.
Results:
A total of 336 videos from 30 patients were analyzed. The ICC between the two measurement methods was 0.13 for TVD, 0.14 for PVD, and 0.16 for PPV. Bland-Altman analysis showed mean differences (95% limits of agreement) of 10.46 mm/mm2 (-1.73-22.65 mm/mm2) for TVD, 8.25 mm/mm2 (-9.88-26.39 mm/mm2) for PVD, and - 3.96% (-59.58%-51.65%) for PPV.
Discussion:
Automated microcirculatory analysis using the Analysis Manager did not show clinically acceptable agreement with manual analysis using Capillary Mapper. Consequently, automated video analysis using the Analysis Manager does not appear to be a suitable approach.
Trial Registration:
ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: DRKS00020264.
More Related Videos
07:26Author Spotlight: Creating Human Vascularized Micro-Tumors as Models for Translational Cancer Research
Published on: September 15, 2023
10:24Ischemic Tissue Injury in the Dorsal Skinfold Chamber of the Mouse: A Skin Flap Model to Investigate Acute Persistent Ischemia
Published on: November 17, 2014