pRESET thrombectomy device outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundMany devices are used to perform mechanical thrombectomy in the setting of large vessel occlusion acute ischemic stroke. We sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pRESET stent-retriever systems.MethodsWe conducted a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Relevant studies up to March 2024 were retrieved from PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase databases.ResultsA total of 8 papers met the inclusion/exclusion criteria comprising a total of 1140 participants (average age 72.4 ± 11.9, female percentage (50%). Preintervention intravenous thrombolysis was utilized in 46.5% (range 32.9-65.4) of patients, with a median National Institute of Health Stroke Scale at presentation of 15 (range 0-38). The middle cerebral artery was the most commonly affected artery, with a prevalence of 76.4% (range 62.8-100). The pRESET stent-retriever systems demonstrated a first-passing effect rate of 53.4% [95% confidence interval [CI] 44.8; 61.7] and a final thrombolysis in cerebral infarction 2b-3 grade rate of 90.41% [95% CI 82.13; 95.08]. Ninety-day modified Rankin Scale (0-2) rate was 42.2% [95% CI 27.6; 58.4], and 90-day mortality rate was 15.1% [95% CI 9.8; 22.6]. Postintervention hemorrhage occurred at a rate of 28.6% [CI 17.2; 43.6].ConclusionOur systematic review and meta-analysis describes the efficacy of the pRESET stent retriever system in managing acute ischemic stroke patients. The pRESET device was found to have a similar safety and efficacy profile to other mechanical thrombectomy devices currently in use.