Improving prediction of groundwater quality in situations of limited monitoring data based on virtual sample generation and Gaussian process regression
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 11, 2025

Continuous Hydrologic and Water Quality Monitoring of Vernal Ponds
Published on: November 13, 2017
Jiang Zhang1, Changlai Xiao1, Weifei Yang1
1Key Laboratory of Groundwater Resources and Environment, Ministry of Education, Jilin University Changchun 130021, China; Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Environment, Jilin University Changchun 130021, China; College of New Energy and Environment, Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China; National-Local Joint Engineering Laboratory of In-Situ Conversion, Drilling and Exploitation Technology for Oil Shale, Changchun 130021, China.
Abstract:
The increasing pollution of aquifers by human activities over recent decades poses a threat to drinking water safety. While Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) is a robust tool for predicting and monitoring water quality, its effectiveness is hindered limitations of available data on model training and validation, known as the "small sample problem". Various attempts to resolve this problem include virtual sample generation (VSG). This study aimed to increase the accuracy of GPR for predicting water quality in situations of limited datasets. Three VSG methods, namely Multi Distribution Mega-Trend Diffusion (MD-MTD), Generative Adversarial Network (GAN), and t-distributed stochastic nearest neighbor embedding (t-SNE) were compared for enhancing the accuracy of GPR model prediction of Strontium (Sr2+). The models were used to predict Sr2+ in the shallow aquifer system in Songyuan, Jilin Province. The results showed that t-SNE provided the most significant improvement to the accuracy of the GPR, with R2 increasing from 0.86 to 0.99 (12.98 %), followed by MD-MTD (R2 of 0.95, 9.39 %), with the least improvement obtained by GAN (R2 of 0.92, 5.98 %). Boxplots show that MD-MTD-GPR predictions do not fully capture observed data distributions. GANs accurately replicate the data distribution, while t-SNE-GPR achieves the highest prediction accuracy and handles data fluctuations. GPR accuracy improves with an increasing number of virtual samples but tends to decrease when the number exceeds 258 in this study. This study can guide the improvement of the accuracy of GPR for situations of limited datasets. The results of this study can help improve water quality management and drinking water safety in regions with sparse monitoring data.
Related Concept Videos
Sampling Plans
Random sampling is a method where each member of the population has an equal chance of being selected for the sample. It involves selecting individuals randomly, often using random number generators or lottery-type methods. For example, when analyzing the properties of a...
Gradually Varying Flow
Sampling Methods: Sample Types
Solid samples include a variety of substances, such as sediments from water bodies, soil, metals, and biological tissues. Two standard methods for extracting sediments from water bodies are grab sampling and piston coring. Grab sampling involves using a device to collect a discrete sediment sample from the bottom of a water body with minimal disturbance. Grab samples do not always represent the entire area due to...
Levels of Use of a GIS
Sampling Methods: Overview
In analytical chemistry, the choice of...
Typical Model Studies

