Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

'Sensory and Motor Neuroscience': Impacts of Thirteen Highly Cited Articles Published in This Section of <i>Brain Sciences</i> in 2024.

Brain sciences·2026
Same author

Effect of Neck Muscle Vibration Prior to Motor Learning on Short-Latency SEP Peak Amplitudes and Motor Performance.

Brain sciences·2025
Same author

VR Human-Centric Winter Lane Detection: Performance and Driving Experience Evaluation.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

MazeOut Adaptive Serious Game: Evaluation of Performance and Usability for Motor Rehabilitation in Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Games for health journal·2025
Same author

Reliability of the Second and Third Iterations of the Sensory-Motor Dysfunction Questionnaire in a Subclinical Neck Pain Population.

Brain sciences·2025
Same author

The impact of subclinical neck pain and laterality on vertical goal directed upper limb movements.

Experimental brain research·2024
Same journal

Anterior Cingulate Cortex Mediates State-Dependent Prioritization of Distressed Conspecifics.

Brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Hemispherotomy for Pediatric Post-Traumatic Epilepsy.

Brain sciences·2026
Same journal

When Robots Learn: Artificial Intelligence and the Next Human-Centered Era of Neurorehabilitation.

Brain sciences·2026
Same journal

The Association Between Changes in White Matter Microstructure and Cognitive Function in Older Adults with Mild Cognitive Impairment.

Brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Beyond Ventricular Enlargement: Multimodal MRI Assessment Improves Surgical Decision-Making in Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus.

Brain sciences·2026
Same journal

The Effects of Personalized Observation, Execution, and Mental Imagery (POEM) Therapy in Logopenic Primary Progressive Aphasia: A Telepractice-Based Single-Case Study.

Brain sciences·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 11, 2025

Brain-Computer Interface-controlled Upper Limb Robotic System for Enhancing Daily Activities in Stroke Patients
06:11

Brain-Computer Interface-controlled Upper Limb Robotic System for Enhancing Daily Activities in Stroke Patients

Published on: April 18, 2025

275

A Machine Learning Approach to Classifying EEG Data Collected with or without Haptic Feedback during a Simulated

Michael S Ramirez Campos1,2,3, Heather S McCracken1, Alvaro Uribe-Quevedo4

  • 1Faculty of Health Sciences, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, ON L1G 0C5, Canada.

Brain Sciences
|September 28, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Machine learning accurately identified neural responses to haptic feedback in virtual reality (VR) simulations. This advance in electroencephalography (EEG) analysis can enhance VR training protocols for skill acquisition.

Keywords:
electroencephalography (EEG)haptic feedbackmachine learningsimulations

More Related Videos

Simultaneous Scalp Electroencephalography EEG, Electromyography EMG, and Whole-body Segmental Inertial Recording for Multi-modal Neural Decoding
11:25

Simultaneous Scalp Electroencephalography EEG, Electromyography EMG, and Whole-body Segmental Inertial Recording for Multi-modal Neural Decoding

Published on: July 26, 2013

43.3K
Mapping Cortical Dynamics Using Simultaneous MEG/EEG and Anatomically-constrained Minimum-norm Estimates: an Auditory Attention Example
08:45

Mapping Cortical Dynamics Using Simultaneous MEG/EEG and Anatomically-constrained Minimum-norm Estimates: an Auditory Attention Example

Published on: October 24, 2012

14.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 11, 2025

Brain-Computer Interface-controlled Upper Limb Robotic System for Enhancing Daily Activities in Stroke Patients
06:11

Brain-Computer Interface-controlled Upper Limb Robotic System for Enhancing Daily Activities in Stroke Patients

Published on: April 18, 2025

275
Simultaneous Scalp Electroencephalography EEG, Electromyography EMG, and Whole-body Segmental Inertial Recording for Multi-modal Neural Decoding
11:25

Simultaneous Scalp Electroencephalography EEG, Electromyography EMG, and Whole-body Segmental Inertial Recording for Multi-modal Neural Decoding

Published on: July 26, 2013

43.3K
Mapping Cortical Dynamics Using Simultaneous MEG/EEG and Anatomically-constrained Minimum-norm Estimates: an Auditory Attention Example
08:45

Mapping Cortical Dynamics Using Simultaneous MEG/EEG and Anatomically-constrained Minimum-norm Estimates: an Auditory Attention Example

Published on: October 24, 2012

14.6K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Computer Science
  • Biomedical Engineering

Background:

  • Virtual reality (VR) and AI simulations offer accessible training platforms.
  • Objective neural assessment using electroencephalography (EEG) is preferred over self-reports for sensory feedback analysis.
  • Identifying specific EEG features related to sensory feedback impact remains a challenge.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To apply machine learning to differentiate neural circuitry associated with haptic versus non-haptic feedback during a simulated drilling task.
  • To identify key EEG signal features indicative of haptic feedback's influence on neural processing.

Main Methods:

  • Machine learning techniques were employed to analyze EEG data from a simulated drilling task.
  • Nine EEG channels were analyzed, extracting 360 features (time-domain, frequency-domain, nonlinear).
  • A feature selection process identified the most relevant EEG features for differentiating feedback types.

Main Results:

  • Machine learning models accurately distinguished trials with haptic feedback from those without, achieving over 90% accuracy with five selected features.
  • Accuracy increased to 99% when utilizing ten features.
  • Key identified features included Hurst exponent, kurtosis, power spectral density, variance, and spectral entropy across specific frequency bands.

Conclusions:

  • Machine learning effectively predicts the impact of haptic feedback on neural processing during VR simulation.
  • This approach can optimize VR and simulation-based training for skill acquisition.
  • Future research can leverage these findings to refine VR training protocols and objective assessments.