Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 11, 2025
Procoagulant Platelet Characterization by Measuring Phosphatidylserine Exposure and Microvesicle Release from Human Purified Platelets
Published on: November 29, 2024
Impact of Shaking EDTA, Citrate, or MgSO4 Tubes on Platelet Count Results
Michel Soulard1, Hela Ketatni1, Claire Visseaux1
1Biogroup Hematology Laboratory, La Chocolaterie, 92300 Levallois Perret, France.
Background: In EDTA-induced pseudothrombopenia, citrate or MgSO4 are recommended for platelet counting. Pre-analytical conditions are poorly defined for tubes containing MgSO4 or citrate. In this study, we analyzed the impact of agitation of these tubes on platelet counts. Methods: K2EDTA, citrate, and MgSO4 tubes from 70 patients were gently agitated on a wheel rotating at 20 rpm. Platelets were analyzed on the Sysmex XN analyzer at different times, and the percentage of platelet deviation from T0 was assessed and compared with the desirable bias of the EFLM. Results: at 180 min in fluorescence, the relative variation of platelets after shaking is 1.17% for K2EDTA, -29.76% for citrate, and -33.18% for MgSO4, while for unshaken MgSO4 platelets the variation is -1.3%. The reduction in platelet numbers when citrate or MgSO4 tubes are shaken is linked to the appearance of platelet clusters. Conclusions: agitation of MgSO4 and especially citrate tubes led to a decrease in platelet counts due to the formation of platelet aggregates; on the other hand, platelet counts on EDTA are virtually stable. During transport, we recommend putting sodium citrate and MgSO4 tubes in an upright position and avoiding shaking them to avoid giving an erroneous platelet result.
Background: In EDTA-induced pseudothrombopenia, citrate or MgSO4 are recommended for platelet counting. Pre-analytical conditions are poorly defined for tubes containing MgSO4 or citrate. In this study, we analyzed the impact of agitation of these tubes on platelet counts. Methods: K2EDTA, citrate, and MgSO4 tubes from 70 patients were gently agitated on a wheel rotating at 20 rpm. Platelets were analyzed on the Sysmex XN analyzer at different times, and the percentage of platelet deviation from T0 was assessed and compared with the desirable bias of the EFLM. Results: at 180 min in fluorescence, the relative variation of platelets after shaking is 1.17% for K2EDTA, -29.76% for citrate, and -33.18% for MgSO4, while for unshaken MgSO4 platelets the variation is -1.3%. The reduction in platelet numbers when citrate or MgSO4 tubes are shaken is linked to the appearance of platelet clusters. Conclusions: agitation of MgSO4 and especially citrate tubes led to a decrease in platelet counts due to the formation of platelet aggregates; on the other hand, platelet counts on EDTA are virtually stable. During transport, we recommend putting sodium citrate and MgSO4 tubes in an upright position and avoiding shaking them to avoid giving an erroneous platelet result.
Related Concept Videos
01:18Effects of EDTA on End-Point Detection Methods
In the visual method, metal-ion indicators (metallochromic dyes), which have distinct colors in their free and complex forms, are added to the mixture to signal the titration's end point. They form stable complexes with metal ions, but these complexes are weaker than the corresponding metal–EDTA complexes. As a...
01:30EDTA: Direct, Back-, and Displacement Titration
Direct titration involves buffering the metal ion solution to the desired pH and directly titrating with standard EDTA until the endpoint. The optimum pH ensures a large conditional formation constant of metal−EDTA and visibility of the free indicator color in the solution. In addition, auxiliary complexing reagents are used to prevent the precipitation of metal hydroxides...
01:26EDTA: Auxiliary Complexing Reagents
01:23EDTA: Indirect and Alkalimetric Titration