A French Preoperative Cholesteatoma Management: Current Preoperative Consultation and Tendencies

Objectives: This study aimed to characterize the information delivery during preoperative consultations for cholesteatoma removal surgery in 2024. The secondary objective was to identify any factors influencing the information delivered. Methods: This study was a practice survey which included 33 closed-ended questions and 1 open-ended question. Seven questions concerned the participants' characteristics and 2 questions concerned the physiopathology of cholesteatoma. Nine questions focused on surgical information, six questions focused on the procedure modalities and ten questions focused on the risks of complications from the intervention. Results: Eighty-two surgeons answered the survey. In 75% of the cases, an information form written by a professional society was provided. The risk of recurrence or residual post-operative cholesteatoma was systematically stated in 78% of cases (n = 64), while the risk of aesthetic sequelae was only stated in 1% (n = 1). Participants working in a university hospital were more likely to inform patients about the risks of vertigo (p = 0.04), aesthetic risks (p = 0.04), poor functional outcomes (p = 0.04), surgical revision (p = 0.05) and the risk of peripheral facial paralysis (p = 0.05). Surgeons who mainly practiced otology were more likely to inform patients about the risks of recurrence and/or residual cholesteatoma (p = 0.02) and taste disturbances (p = 0.02). Conclusions: Cholesteatoma surgery was well explained to patients during the preoperative consultation, mostly with written support, even if the information given was not the same for all complication risks. It could be useful to create an information form dedicated to cholesteatoma surgery to improve comprehensive information and maintain a trustworthy relationship with patients.