Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 11, 2025

A Quick Phenotypic Neurological Scoring System for Evaluating Disease Progression in the SOD1-G93A Mouse Model of ALS
Published on: October 6, 2015
Assessing disease progression in ALS: prognostic subgroups and outliers
Inês Alves1, Marta Gromicho1, Miguel Oliveira Santos1,2
1Faculdade de Medicina, Centro de Estudos Egas Moniz, Instituto de Medicina Molecular João Lobo Antunes, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Background:
The rate of disease progression, measured by the decline of ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R) from symptom onset to diagnosis (ΔFS) is a well-established prognostic biomarker for predicting survival. Objectives: This study aims to categorize a large patient cohort based on the initial ΔFS and subsequently investigate survival deviations from the expected prognosis defined by ΔFS.
Methods:
1056 ALS patients were stratified into three progression categories based on their ΔFS: slow progressors (below 25th percentile), intermediate progressors (between 25th and 75th percentiles), and fast progressors (above 75th percentile). Survival outcomes were classified as short survivors (<2 years), average survivors (2-5 years), and long survivors (>5 years). Clinical and demographic characteristics within each subgroup were then analyzed.
Results:
ΔFS stratification yielded cutoff values of <0.29, 0.29-1.03, and >1.03 points/month. Long survivors comprised 26% and 21% were short survivors. Six percent of the fast progressors had a life expectancy of more than 5 years, and none of the clinical and demographic characteristics analyzed could fully explain this discrepancy. Conversely, 13% of intermediate progressors lived less than 2 years, according to a short-diagnostic delay in these patients.
Discussion:
Our study reaffirms ΔFS as a prognostic biomarker for ALS. We disclosed outliers defying anticipated patterns. The observed shift in progression categories underscores the non-linear nature of disease progression. Genetic and unknown biological reasons may explain these deviations. Further research is needed to fully understand modulation of ALS survival.
Related Concept Videos
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Cancer Survival Analysis
Assumptions of Survival Analysis

