Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 4, 2026

Clinical Assessment of Spatiotemporal Gait Parameters in Patients and Older Adults
Published on: November 7, 2014
From lab to field: validity and reliability of inertial measurement unit-derived gait parameters during a
Elliot Webber1,2, Cédric Leduc1,2, Stacey Emmonds1
1Centre for Human Performance, Carnegie School of Sport, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK.
Abstract:
The aim was to assess concurrent validity and test-retest reliability of spatiotemporal gait parameters from a thoracic-placed inertial measurement unit (IMU) in lab- (Phase One) and field-based (Phase Two) conditions. Spatiotemporal gait parameters were compared (target speeds 3, 5 and 7.5 m·s-1) between a 100 Hz IMU and an optical measurement system (OptoJump Next, 1000 hz) in 14 trained individuals (Phase One). Additionally, 29 English Premier League football players performed weekly 3 × 60 m runs (5 m·s-1; observations = 1227; Phase Two). Mixed effects modelling assessed the effect of speed on agreement between systems (Phase One) and test-retest reliability (Phase Two). IMU step time showed strong agreement (<0.3%) regardless of individual or running speed. Direction of mean biases up to 40 ms for contact and flight time depended on the running speed and individual. Step time, length and frequency were most reliable (coefficient of variation = 1.3-1.4%) but confounded by running speed. Step time, length and frequency derived from a thoracic-placed IMU can be used confidently. Contact time could be used if bias is corrected for each individual. To optimise test-retest reliability, a minimum running distance of 40 m is needed to ensure 10 constant-speed steps is gathered.
Related Concept Videos
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision
Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...
Data Validation
Key parameters for method validation include:
Measures of Intelligence
Validity refers to how well a test measures what it claims to measure. An intelligence test should accurately assess intelligence rather than another characteristic, like anxiety. Criterion validity is one way to evaluate this; it...

