Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 11, 2025

Characterization and Application of Passive Samplers for Monitoring of Pesticides in Water
Published on: August 3, 2016
Natural deep eutectic solvent-based dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction of pesticides in drinking waters
Аsya Hristozova1, Lorena Vidal2, Miguel Ángel Aguirre2
1Department of Analytical Chemistry and Computer Chemistry, University of Plovdiv Paisii Hilendarski, 24 Tzar Asen Str., 4000, Plovdiv, Bulgaria.
Abstract:
The current research aims to develop a new analytical method applying a dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME) assisted by vortex and using an environmentally friendly extractant for the preconcentration of organochlorine and organophosphorus pesticides followed by gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (GC-MS/MS) analysis. The extractant (i.e., natural deep eutectic solvent (NADES)) is safe, cheap, biodegradable and can be prepared by simply mixing DL-menthol and decanoic acid (molar ratio 2:1). The main experimental factors affecting the extraction of all analytes evaluated (19 organochlorine and organophosphorus pesticides) have been optimised using a multivariate analysis consisting in two steps: a Plackett-Burman design followed by a central composite design (CCD). Seven experimental factors have been evaluated: (i) sample volume; (ii) NADES volume; (iii) sample pH; (iv) extraction time; (v) centrifugation time; (vi) centrifugation speed; and (vii) ionic strength (NaCl %, w v-1). For the significant variables, the optimum values were 10 mL sample and 45 μL NADES. No pH adjustment as well as addition of NaCl were needed. The other variables were set at 3 min extraction time, 5 min centrifugation time and 900×g centrifugation speed, respectively. Under the optimised extraction conditions, the limit of quantification (LOQ) values ranged between 0.2 and 78 ng L-1 for all analysed pesticides. Furthermore, the proposed analytical method has been successfully applied to drinking water (bottled spring water). The recovery study (n = 3) has been evaluated at 0.1, 1.0 and 5.0 μg L-1 spiking levels, obtaining relative recovery values within the range of 70 % and 117 % and RSD values between 1 % and 20 % for all the analytes studied, except for p,p-DDT (56-77 % in high conductivity water samples).
More Related Videos
07:26A Simple Method for Automated Solid Phase Extraction of Water Samples for Immunological Analysis of Small Pollutants
Published on: January 1, 2016
04:17Analysis of Organochlorine Pesticides in a Soil Sample by a Modified QuEChERS Approach Using Ammonium Formate
Published on: January 20, 2023