Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

Robbers Cave04:49

Robbers Cave

14.3K
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...
14.3K
Aggression01:47

Aggression

27.7K
Humans engage in aggression when they seek to cause harm or pain to another person. Aggression takes two forms depending on one’s motives: hostile or instrumental. Hostile aggression is motivated by feelings of anger with intent to cause pain; a fight in a bar with a stranger is an example of hostile aggression. In contrast, instrumental aggression is motivated by achieving a goal and does not necessarily involve intent to cause pain (Berkowitz, 1993); a contract killer who murders for...
27.7K
Social Facilitation01:04

Social Facilitation

31.8K
Not all intergroup interactions lead to negative outcomes. Sometimes, being in a group situation can improve performance. Social facilitation occurs when an individual performs better when an audience is watching than when the individual performs the behavior alone. This typically occurs when people are performing a task for which they are skilled.
31.8K
Dynamic Equilibrium02:20

Dynamic Equilibrium

50.7K
A reversible chemical reaction represents a chemical process that proceeds in both forward (left to right) and reverse (right to left) directions. When the rates of the forward and reverse reactions are equal, the concentrations of the reactant and product species remain constant over time and the system is at equilibrium. A special double arrow is used to emphasize the reversible nature of the reaction. The relative concentrations of reactants and products in equilibrium systems vary greatly;...
50.7K
Social Traps01:41

Social Traps

22.3K
Social traps are negative situations where people get caught in a direction or relationship that later proves to be unpleasant, with no easy way to back out of or avoid. The concept was orignally introduced by John Platt who applied psychology to Garrett Hardin's "Tragedy of the Commons", where in New England herd owners could let their cattle graze in the common ground. This situation seems like a good idea, but an individual could have an advantage. If they owned...
22.3K
Social Exchange Theory02:06

Social Exchange Theory

34.4K
We have discussed why we form relationships, what attracts us to others, and different types of love. But what determines whether we are satisfied with and stay in a relationship? One theory that provides an explanation is social exchange theory. According to social exchange theory, we act as naïve economists in keeping a tally of the ratio of costs and benefits of forming and maintaining a relationship with others (Rusbult & Van Lange, 2003).
34.4K
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies
  1. Home
  2. Constructive Agents Nullify The Ability Of Destructive Agents To Foster Cooperation In Public Goods Games.
  1. Home
  2. Constructive Agents Nullify The Ability Of Destructive Agents To Foster Cooperation In Public Goods Games.

Related Experiment Video

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
06:18

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

Published on: October 20, 2022

2.0K

Constructive agents nullify the ability of destructive agents to foster cooperation in public goods games.

Yuting Dong1, Zhixue He1,2, Chen Shen3

  • 1School of Statistics and Mathematics, Yunnan University of Finance and Economics, Kunming 650221, China.

Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.)
|October 1, 2024

View abstract on PubMed

Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Introducing constructive agents in public goods games, this study finds they can hinder cooperation if their benefits outweigh destructive agent harm. This contrasts with destructive agents, which can surprisingly promote cooperation.

More Related Videos

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.3K
Peering into the Dynamics of Social Interactions: Measuring Play Fighting in Rats
15:01

Peering into the Dynamics of Social Interactions: Measuring Play Fighting in Rats

Published on: January 18, 2013

15.3K

Related Experiment Videos

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
06:18

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

Published on: October 20, 2022

2.0K
The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.3K
Peering into the Dynamics of Social Interactions: Measuring Play Fighting in Rats
15:01

Peering into the Dynamics of Social Interactions: Measuring Play Fighting in Rats

Published on: January 18, 2013

15.3K

Area of Science:

  • Evolutionary Game Theory
  • Behavioral Economics
  • Social Dynamics

Background:

  • Public goods games demonstrate cooperation can be unexpectedly bolstered by destructive agents.
  • Constructive agents, conferring benefits to all players, are a novel concept in these games.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of constructive agents on cooperation dynamics in public goods games.
  • To compare the effects of constructive agents with those of previously studied destructive agents.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing replicator dynamics to model agent interactions.
  • Analyzing scenarios based on the balance between benefits from constructive agents and harm from destructive agents.

Main Results:

  • Constructive agents alone do not alter the defective equilibrium.
  • When constructive benefits outweigh destructive harm, constructive agents negate the cooperation-sustaining effect of destructive agents.
  • In scenarios of cyclic dominance, constructive agents add complexity without changing the fundamental equilibrium.
  • Conclusions:

    • The role of constructive agents in cooperation is nuanced and depends on incentive balances.
    • Careful assessment of agent interactions is crucial for strategies aimed at promoting cooperation.