Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Ionic Radii03:10

Ionic Radii

27.5K
Ionic radius is the measure used to describe the size of an ion. A cation always has fewer electrons and the same number of protons as the parent atom; it is smaller than the atom from which it is derived. For example, the covalent radius of an aluminum atom (1s22s22p63s23p1) is 118 pm, whereas the ionic radius of an Al3+ (1s22s22p6) is 68 pm. As electrons are removed from the outer valence shell, the remaining core electrons occupying smaller shells experience a greater effective nuclear...
27.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Chemical and physical equilibria shape dual ice-nucleation pathways in an organic crystal.

Communications chemistry·2026
Same author

Why Seeding Works When Nucleation Barriers Vanish.

Journal of the American Chemical Society·2026
Same author

Design Principles for β-Solenoid Stability via Covalent and Electrostatic Capping Motifs.

The journal of physical chemistry letters·2026
Same author

Ion-Exchange Membranes Prevent Nanobubble Detachment But Do Not Limit Electrolysis Current.

ACS applied materials & interfaces·2026
Same author

Bias, Length, or Coupling: What Controls the Quantum Efficiency of Molecular Electroluminescence?

Nano letters·2026
Same author

Non-equilibrium relaxation in water no man's land.

The Journal of chemical physics·2026
Same journal

Chemotactic self-organization captures the dynamics of mammalian hair follicle patterning.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same journal

Tomographic imaging of superconducting order using particle-hole interference.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same journal

Inhibitory potential of autologous neutralizing antibodies sets quantitative limits on the rebound-competent HIV-1 reservoir.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same journal

Inferring epidemiological parameters under an infectious phylogeography model with visitor dynamics.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same journal

Analytical modeling for suction cup designs for skin-interfaced wearable devices.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same journal

Improving cell-free metabolism through direct integration of artificial respiratory chains.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 11, 2025

Precise Electrochemical Sizing of Individual Electro-Inactive Particles
05:03

Precise Electrochemical Sizing of Individual Electro-Inactive Particles

Published on: August 4, 2023

1.2K

The smallest electrochemical bubbles.

Esteban D Gadea1,2, Yamila A Perez Sirkin1, Valeria Molinero2

  • 1Departamento de Química Inorgánica, Analítica y Química Física/INQUIMAE, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires C1428EHA, Argentina.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
|October 2, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Nanoelectrodes can enhance electrochemical gas production by preventing bubble formation. Simulations reveal optimal nanoelectrode sizes between single-atom and 3 nm for maximum current and efficiency.

Keywords:
catalysiselectrochemistrykinetic Monte Carlomolecular dynamicsnanoelectrodes

More Related Videos

Probing Surface Electrochemical Activity of Nanomaterials using a Hybrid Atomic Force Microscope-Scanning Electrochemical Microscope AFM-SECM
08:31

Probing Surface Electrochemical Activity of Nanomaterials using a Hybrid Atomic Force Microscope-Scanning Electrochemical Microscope AFM-SECM

Published on: February 10, 2021

6.8K
Aqueous Droplets Used as Enzymatic Microreactors and Their Electromagnetic Actuation
08:27

Aqueous Droplets Used as Enzymatic Microreactors and Their Electromagnetic Actuation

Published on: August 28, 2017

5.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 11, 2025

Precise Electrochemical Sizing of Individual Electro-Inactive Particles
05:03

Precise Electrochemical Sizing of Individual Electro-Inactive Particles

Published on: August 4, 2023

1.2K
Probing Surface Electrochemical Activity of Nanomaterials using a Hybrid Atomic Force Microscope-Scanning Electrochemical Microscope AFM-SECM
08:31

Probing Surface Electrochemical Activity of Nanomaterials using a Hybrid Atomic Force Microscope-Scanning Electrochemical Microscope AFM-SECM

Published on: February 10, 2021

6.8K
Aqueous Droplets Used as Enzymatic Microreactors and Their Electromagnetic Actuation
08:27

Aqueous Droplets Used as Enzymatic Microreactors and Their Electromagnetic Actuation

Published on: August 28, 2017

5.3K

Area of Science:

  • Electrochemistry
  • Materials Science
  • Nanotechnology

Background:

  • Electrochemical processes often generate gas, leading to bubble formation that blocks electrode surfaces.
  • This bubble blockage causes increased overpotentials and Ohmic drop, limiting efficiency in catalysis and energy storage.
  • Nanoelectrodes were proposed to mitigate bubble formation, but experiments showed they still form nanobubbles, limiting current.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Investigate the potential-current response of nanoelectrodes down to the single-atom level.
  • Understand the role of electrode size in gas bubble nucleation and stability.
  • Identify optimal nanoelectrode dimensions for enhanced electrochemical gas production.

Main Methods:

  • Employed molecular simulations to model electrochemical gas generation at nanoelectrode surfaces.
  • Analyzed potential-current responses for disk electrodes with diameters down to atomic scale.
  • Calculated the grand potential of surface nanobubbles to determine their thermodynamic stability.

Main Results:

  • Nanoelectrodes around 1 nm can deliver twice the current of much larger electrodes.
  • Gas phase destabilization on smaller nanoelectrodes boosts extracted current.
  • Surface nanobubbles are thermodynamically unstable on supports smaller than 2 nm.

Conclusions:

  • Nanoelectrodes smaller than 2 nm prevent stable nanobubble formation, improving electroactive area accessibility.
  • Electrode radius significantly impacts current, which becomes sensitive to size below 2 nm.
  • An optimal nanoelectrode size exists between single-atom and approximately 3 nm for maximizing gas production.