Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 11, 2025

Post-Myocardial Infarction Heart Failure in Closed-chest Coronary Occlusion/Reperfusion Model in Göttingen Minipigs and Landrace Pigs
Published on: April 17, 2021
Revascularization and outcomes in ischaemic left ventricular dysfunction after heart failure admission: The
Carlos Moliner-Abós1, Maria Calvo-Barceló2, Eduard Solé-Gonzalez3
1Cardiology Department, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, IIb-SantPau, CIBERCV, Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Insights
Revascularization did not improve long-term survival for heart failure patients with ischaemic left ventricular dysfunction compared to guideline-directed medical therapy. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Cardiovascular Research
- Heart Failure Management
Background:
- The role of revascularization in heart failure (HF) with ischaemic left ventricular (LV) dysfunction remains debated.
- Guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) has demonstrated benefits in HF outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare long-term mortality between revascularization and GDMT in patients with ischaemic LV dysfunction post-HF admission.
- To evaluate the impact of revascularization strategies (PCI vs. CABG) on mortality and LV remodelling.
Main Methods:
- A multicentre retrospective analysis included 408 patients with HF, LVEF ≤40%, and coronary artery disease (CAD).
- Patients were treated with either revascularization (PCI or CABG) or GDMT.
- Primary outcome was all-cause or cardiovascular mortality; secondary outcomes included LV reverse remodelling.
Main Results:
- After a median follow-up of 44.6 months, revascularization (33% mortality) did not significantly reduce all-cause or cardiovascular mortality compared to GDMT (43% mortality).
- Neither percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) nor coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) showed a mortality benefit over GDMT.
- Both groups showed LV reverse remodelling, with greater improvements observed in the revascularization group.
Conclusions:
- Revascularization did not demonstrate superior long-term mortality benefits over GDMT in patients with ischaemic LV dysfunction following HF admission.
- Larger prospective studies are warranted to definitively establish the role of revascularization in this patient population.
Aims:
Despite numerous trials on revascularization in patients with heart failure (HF) and ischaemic left ventricular (LV) dysfunction, its role remains unsettled. Guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for HF has shown benefits on outcomes. This multicentre study aims to compare long-term mortality between revascularization and GDMT in patients with ischaemic LV dysfunction following admission for HF.
Methods And Results:
Between 2012 and 2023, 408 patients admitted for HF with a LV ejection fraction (LVEF) of 40% or less and documented coronary artery disease (CAD) were included. Patients were categorized into two groups based on their initial treatment decision: revascularization (percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI] or coronary artery bypass graft [CABG]) or GDMT. The primary outcome was rate of all-cause or cardiovascular mortality, and secondary outcomes included type of revascularization (PCI vs. CABG) and LV reverse remodelling. After a median 44.6-month follow-up, 100 patients (33%) died in the revascularization group, compared to 44 (43%) in the GDMT group. Multivariate analysis showed no significant benefit of revascularization on all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 0.81, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.48-1.39, p = 0.45) or cardiovascular mortality (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.62-1.52, p = 0.90) compared to GDMT. Neither CABG (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.51-1.08, p = 0.13) nor PCI (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.62-1.55, p = 0.93) demonstrated a mortality reduction compared to GDMT. Both groups experienced significant reductions in LV size and improvements in LVEF, greater in the revascularization group.
Conclusion:
Revascularization did not outperform GDMT in ischaemic LV dysfunction following HF admission in this retrospective analysis. Larger prospective studies are needed to clarify the potential role of revascularization in improving outcomes.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Heart Failure V: Medical Management

