Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 11, 2025

An Immunohistopathologic Study to Profile the Folate Receptor Beta Macrophage and Vascular Immune Microenvironment in Giant Cell Arteritis
Published on: February 8, 2019
Investigating interferon type I responses in patients with suspected giant cell arteritis and polymyalgia rheumatica
Marieke van Nieuwland1,2, A H Leontine Mulder3,4, Edgar M Colin1
1Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Hospital Group Twente (Ziekenhuisgroep Twente), Almelo, The Netherlands.
Abstract:
Giant cell arteritis (GCA) and polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) are closely related inflammatory disorders. Easily measurable biomarkers defining active disease and identifying patients in need of glucocorticoid sparing treatment options are highly desired. Interferon Type I (IFN-I) might be involved in disease pathology; however, evidence is limited. This study explores a systemic IFN-I signature and expression of IFN-I markers in GCA and PMR patients. Treatment naive GCA and PMR patients, and PMR patients with glucocorticoid treatment were included. Patients suspected of but not diagnosed with GCA were used as controls. Five relevant IFN-I-stimulated genes were identified in literature, and relative expression levels were determined using quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. An IFN-I score was generated. Serum levels of IFN-I induced C-X-C motif chemokine 10 (CXCL10) and Galectin-9 were determined by multiplex immunoassay. There were no differences in IFN-I scores between the groups. An IFN-I signature was observed in 0/9 controls, 2/11 GCA patients, 4/20 treatment naive PMR patients, and 2/10 PMR patients with treatment. Serum CXCL10 and Galectin-9 were not increased in GCA or PMR patients compared to control patients. Treated PMR patients had lower CXCL10 levels [423.2 pg/ml (375.1-491.1)] compared to treatment naive PMR patients [641.8 pg/ml (552.8-830.6)]. An IFN-I signature does not distinguish GCA and PMR patients from controls. Also, IFN-I-induced serum markers are not upregulated in GCA and PMR patients. Easily measurable IFN-I-induced serum markers will therefore probably not aid in diagnosis and additional treatment options in newly diagnosed GCA and PMR patients.
More Related Videos
10:00High-throughput Quantitative Real-time RT-PCR Assay for Determining Expression Profiles of Types I and III Interferon Subtypes
Published on: March 24, 2015
08:26Development and Validation of an Ultrasensitive Single Molecule Array Digital Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay for Human Interferon-α
Published on: June 14, 2018
Related Concept Videos
T Cell Types and Functions
Th1 cells stimulate dendritic cells to express necessary co-stimulatory molecules on their surfaces for...
Drugs for Treatment of Crohn's Disease in IBD Using Biologic Agents: Anti-TNF
Myocarditis III: Medical Management
Myasthenia Gravis: Overview and Treatment
These antibodies interfere with the function of the nicotinic receptors in three ways: by binding to the receptor and disrupting acetylcholine binding; by causing cross-linking of receptors which...
Inflammatory Response I: Vascular and Cellular
Myocarditis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests