Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 11, 2025

Microscopic Electric Rotary Grinding of Plaques Combined with Graft Repair in the Management of Peyronie's Disease
Published on: March 15, 2024
Follow Up Care After Penile Sparing Surgery for Penile Cancer: Current Perspectives
Francesco Lasorsa1,2, Gabriele Bignante1,3, Angelo Orsini1,4
1Department of Urology, Rush University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Abstract:
Penile cancer (PeCa) is a rare urologic tumor worldwide. In 2024, 2100 new cases and 500 deaths are estimated in the United States. Radical surgery via total penectomy has historically been the cornerstone of treatment, since it provides excellent long-term oncological control. The rationale of surgery for penile cancer was to achieve a 2 cm macroscopic surgical margin that is historically advocated to reduce recurrences. Over time, numerous studies have demonstrated that resection margin status does not affect patients' survival. Different penile-sparing techniques are currently recommended in the European Association of Urology-American Society of Clinical Oncology (EAU-ASCO) guidelines for the treatment of localized primary PeCa. Centralization of care could yield multiple benefits, including improved disease awareness, higher rates of penile-sparing surgery, enhanced detection rates, increased utilization of less invasive lymph node staging techniques, enhanced quality of specialized histopathological examinations, and the establishment of specialized multidisciplinary teams. Compared to more aggressive treatments, the higher recurrence rates after penile-sparing surgery do not hamper neither the metastasis-free survival nor the overall survival. Repeated penile-sparing surgery could be considered for selected cases. The psychological impact of penile cancer is not negligible since the perceived loss of masculinity might adversely affect mental health and overall well-being. Quality of life may be compromised by sexual and urinary dysfunction which may be the result either of the loss of penile tissue or the psychological status of the patient. It is of utmost importance to offer rehabilitative treatment as sexual therapy, physical therapy, occupational therapy, family and peer counseling.
Insights
Penile cancer treatment is shifting towards penile-sparing surgery, which offers comparable survival rates to radical penectomy. This approach, alongside centralized care and rehabilitation, improves patient quality of life.
Area of Science:
- Urologic Oncology
- Surgical Oncology
Background:
- Penile cancer (PeCa) is a rare malignancy with an estimated 2100 new cases and 500 deaths in the US in 2024.
- Historically, radical penectomy with a 2 cm margin was standard, but evidence suggests margin status doesn't impact survival.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy and impact of penile-sparing techniques in penile cancer treatment.
- To highlight the benefits of centralized care and multidisciplinary approaches for penile cancer management.
Main Methods:
- Review of European Association of Urology-American Society of Clinical Oncology (EAU-ASCO) guidelines.
- Analysis of oncological outcomes and quality of life in patients undergoing penile-sparing surgery versus radical penectomy.
- Assessment of benefits associated with care centralization.
Main Results:
- Penile-sparing surgery is recommended for localized primary penile cancer, showing no detriment to metastasis-free or overall survival despite potentially higher recurrence rates.
- Centralization of care can improve disease awareness, surgical techniques, diagnostic accuracy, and multidisciplinary team establishment.
- Psychological and functional well-being are critical, necessitating comprehensive rehabilitative treatments.
Conclusions:
- Penile-sparing surgery is a viable and oncologically sound alternative to radical penectomy for localized penile cancer.
- Centralized care models and robust rehabilitation programs are essential for optimizing outcomes and quality of life in penile cancer patients.
Related Concept Videos
Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management
Kidney Transplant III: Nursing Management
Appendicitis-II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Diagnosing Appendicitis
It requires a multifaceted approach, starting with a detailed physical examination to pinpoint the location and nature of the pain and identify any associated symptoms. Laboratory tests play a crucial role. A complete Blood Count (CBC) typically reveals leukocytosis (an increased number of...
Aneurysm IV: Nursing Management

