Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 11, 2025

Author Spotlight: Deciphering the Cognitive and Neural Mechanisms of Gesture in Communication
Published on: January 26, 2024
Revisiting Student Stories: Understanding Microaggressions and Interpersonal Conflict Within Speech-Language and
Mariam M Abdelaziz1, Jean F Rivera Pérez2
1Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, North Carolina Central University, Durham.
Students in speech, language, and hearing sciences (SLHS) programs experience significant microaggressions (MAs) and interpersonal conflict (IC). The more marginalized identities reported, the higher the aggression experienced, with underreporting being common.
Area of Science:
- Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences (SLHS)
- Social Sciences
- Psychology
Background:
- Microaggressions (MAs) and interpersonal conflict (IC) are prevalent issues in academic and professional settings.
- Previous research has indicated the presence of MAs and IC in SLHS training programs.
- Understanding the experiences of students from diverse backgrounds is crucial for addressing systemic inequities.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the prevalence and nature of microaggressions (MAs) and interpersonal conflict (IC) within speech, language, and hearing sciences (SLHS) training programs.
- To examine the relationship between marginalized identities and the experience of MAs and IC.
- To identify specific cultural and linguistic factors that predict the experience of particular types of MAs.
Main Methods:
- A quantitative study utilizing a 39-item electronic survey.
- The survey was distributed online to 236 current and former SLHS students via social media and email listservs.
- Data analysis included linear regression to explore the impact of marginalized identities on reported aggression.
Main Results:
- Students from both marginalized and nonmarginalized groups reported high levels of MAs and IC.
- A significant positive correlation was found between the number of marginalized identities reported and the level of experienced aggression.
- Specific cultural and linguistic identities were found to predict certain types of MAs, and MAs and IC were largely underreported.
Conclusions:
- Microaggressions and interpersonal conflict are quantifiable issues within SLHS training programs, affecting students across diverse backgrounds.
- There is an urgent need for interventions to address systemic inequities and promote inclusivity in SLHS.
- Fostering cultural competence and social justice is essential for creating equitable environments in SLHS professions.
Related Concept Videos
Barriers to Effective Communication II
Cultural barriers:
Differences in values, beliefs, religion, knowledge, and tradition can significantly impact communication. Awareness of nonverbal cues is critical, especially when conversing with a patient from a different culture. What appears appropriate in one culture may be inappropriate in another.
Semantic barriers:
As a result of their tendency to use...
Modeling in Therapy
Participant Modeling
Participant modeling involves therapists demonstrating calm and effective behaviors in...
Stereotype Content Model
Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies
Barriers to Effective Communication I
Communication barriers include the following:
Physiological barriers: They are limitations caused by a person's health condition or disability, such as hearing loss, poor eyesight, illness, or unconsciousness. An example to overcome this...
Aggression

