Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Conservative Safety Assessment of a Nitinol Microhook Coaptation Device on Intact Nerve.

Muscle & nerve·2026
Same author

A 25-Year Systematic Review of Flaps for Coverage of the Dorsal Hand.

Annals of plastic surgery·2026
Same author

Digital Nerve Repair With Flexor Tendon Injury: Conduits are Less Effective.

Hand (New York, N.Y.)·2025
Same author

Efficacy of Nerve Tape-Assisted PEG Fusion in a Rabbit Tibial Nerve Repair Model.

Journal of reconstructive microsurgery·2025
Same author

Isograft Obtained From ZDF (Obese Fa/Fa) Rats Does Not Impair Nerve Regeneration Compared to Healthy Isograft.

Muscle & nerve·2025
Same author

Nerve Tape Is an Effective Tool for Small Nerve Repair.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 11, 2025

Implantation and Control of Wireless, Battery-free Systems for Peripheral Nerve Interfacing
07:13

Implantation and Control of Wireless, Battery-free Systems for Peripheral Nerve Interfacing

Published on: October 20, 2021

3.1K

Management of "Long" Nerve Gaps.

Annabel Baek1, Jonathan Isaacs2

  • 1Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University Health System, Richmond, VA.

Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online
|October 9, 2024
PubMed
Summary

Reconstructive surgeons face challenges treating long-gap nerve injuries. This review compares nerve autografts, allografts, and transfers, outlining their pros and cons for evidence-based decision-making.

Keywords:
Autograft nerveNerve gapNerve transfersPeripheral nerve repairProcessed nerve allograft

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface (RPNI) Surgery in Postamputation Pain Management
03:53

Author Spotlight: Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface (RPNI) Surgery in Postamputation Pain Management

Published on: March 15, 2024

1.5K
Traumatic Peripheral Nerve Injury in Mice
06:46

Traumatic Peripheral Nerve Injury in Mice

Published on: March 25, 2022

1.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 11, 2025

Implantation and Control of Wireless, Battery-free Systems for Peripheral Nerve Interfacing
07:13

Implantation and Control of Wireless, Battery-free Systems for Peripheral Nerve Interfacing

Published on: October 20, 2021

3.1K
Author Spotlight: Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface (RPNI) Surgery in Postamputation Pain Management
03:53

Author Spotlight: Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface (RPNI) Surgery in Postamputation Pain Management

Published on: March 15, 2024

1.5K
Traumatic Peripheral Nerve Injury in Mice
06:46

Traumatic Peripheral Nerve Injury in Mice

Published on: March 25, 2022

1.7K

Area of Science:

  • Reconstructive surgery
  • Neurotraumatology
  • Microsurgery

Background:

  • Long-gap nerve injuries present significant challenges in achieving functional recovery.
  • Current treatment options require careful consideration of physiological and logistical factors.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review and compare various surgical techniques for managing long-gap nerve injuries.
  • To provide an evidence-based discussion on the advantages and disadvantages of each approach.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of reconstructive surgical techniques for nerve injuries.
  • Comparative analysis of nerve autograft, processed nerve allograft, nerve transfer, and tendon transfer.
  • Evidence-framing of pros and cons for each treatment modality.

Main Results:

  • Nerve autografts offer autologous tissue but are limited by donor site morbidity and length.
  • Processed nerve allografts provide off-the-shelf options but raise concerns about immunogenicity and integration.
  • Nerve and tendon transfers can restore function but require coaptation with viable recipient nerves/tendons.

Conclusions:

  • The choice of treatment for long-gap nerve injuries depends on injury characteristics, patient factors, and surgeon expertise.
  • Each approach (autograft, allograft, transfer) has distinct benefits and limitations that must be weighed.
  • Further research is needed to optimize outcomes and refine techniques for nerve reconstruction.