Performance of iodine quantification through high-pitch dual-source photon-counting CT: a phantom study
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 11, 2025

Construction of a Preclinical Multimodality Phantom Using Tissue-mimicking Materials for Quality Assurance in Tumor Size Measurement
Published on: July 29, 2013
Peng Liu1, Shanshui Zhou1, Haipeng Dong1
1Department of Radiology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No. 197 Ruijin Er Road, Shanghai, 200025, China.
Purpose:
To investigate the feasibility and accuracy of iodine quantification using PCD-CT in standard-pitch and high-pitch scanning at different scan parameters in a phantom model.
Materials And Methods:
Four inserts with known iodine concentrations (2, 5, 10, and 15 mg/mL) were placed in the removable CT phantom and scanned using high-pitch (3.2) and standard-pitch (0.8) modes on PCD-CT. Two tube voltages (120 and 140 kVp) and four radiation doses (1, 3, 5, and 10 mGy) were alternated. Each scan setting was repeated three times. Mean iodine concentration for each insert across three consecutive slices was recorded. Percentage absolute bias (PAB) was assessed for iodine quantification.
Results:
A total of 96 acquisitions were conducted. In small phantom, the average for PAB was 2.96% (range: 1.75% ~ 4.56%) and 1.67% (range: 1.00% ~ 3.42%) for high-pitch and standard-pitch acquisitions, respectively. In large phantom, it was 3.72% (range: 1.75% ~ 5.97%) and 2.94% (range: 1.75% ~ 4.70%). Linear regression analysis revealed that only phantom size significantly influenced (P < 0.001) the accuracy of iodine quantification.
Conclusion:
The high-pitch scan mode in PCD-CT can be used to quantify iodine density with similar accuracy compared with standard pitch.
More Related Videos
11:09High-Resolution Cardiac Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for Small Animals
Published on: December 16, 2022
09:49A Whole Body Dosimetry Protocol for Peptide-Receptor Radionuclide Therapy PRRT: 2D Planar Image and Hybrid 2D+3D SPECT/CT Image Methods
Published on: April 24, 2020