Preoperative risk-stratified analysis: External versus internal pancreatic stents in pancreatoduodenectomy

Several risk-stratified studies have compared the outcomes of external and internal pancreatic stents in pancreatoduodenectomy (PD), but no resolute standard for a fistula-mitigation strategy exists. The study investigated the efficacy of these stents in a preoperative risk-stratified setting.

Data from 285 patients who underwent PD with pancreaticojejunostomy using an external or internal stent from 2015 to 2023 were analyzed. The preoperative pancreatic fistula score (preFRS) was used to classify patients into low-risk (preFRS: 0-5) and high-risk (preFRS: 6-8) groups.

PreFRS accurately predicted the risk of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) as 0% and >40% in patients with preFRS ≤1 and ≥7, respectively. Although no significant difference was observed in postoperative outcomes in low-risk patients, the external stent significantly reduced CR-POPF (21% vs 44%, P = .024) and postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH, 0% vs 19%, P = .02) in high-risk patients, leading to the superiority of the external stent in the entire cohort in terms of CR-POPF (12% vs 24%, P = .033) and PPH (1% vs 11%, P = .013). There were no significant differences in stent-related complications or pancreatic dysfunction. External stent malfunction occurred in 14% and significantly affected CR-POPF development in both low- (20% vs 0%, P < .01) and high-risk groups (60% vs 14%, P = .021).

The external pancreatic stent showed a more beneficial effect on CR-POPF and PPH, especially in high-risk patients, without increasing other complications. Risk-stratified strategy and improving stent management might enhance postoperative outcomes.