Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 8, 2026

A Method for Manipulating Blood Glucose and Measuring Resulting Changes in Cognitive Accessibility of Target Stimuli
Published on: August 12, 2016
Additional Diagnostic Yield of the Rapid Drink Challenge in Chicago Classification Version 4.0 Compared With Version
Hoyoung Wang1, Kee Wook Jung2, Jin Hee Noh2
1Department of Gastroenterology, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
The rapid drink challenge, when used with Chicago classification 4.0, offers a modest diagnostic improvement for esophageal motility disorders but has a high failure rate. An individualized approach to esophageal manometry is recommended.
Area of Science:
- Gastroenterology
- Esophageal Physiology
- Diagnostic Testing
Background:
- Chicago classification version 4.0 refines the diagnosis of esophageal motility disorders.
- Provocative tests like the rapid drink challenge are integral to updated diagnostic criteria.
- Functional luminal imaging probes aid in assessing esophageal function.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the diagnostic utility of the rapid drink challenge within the Chicago classification 4.0 framework.
- To determine the cutoff value for the rapid drink challenge using a functional luminal imaging probe.
- To evaluate the impact of Chicago classification 4.0 on diagnoses made with the rapid drink challenge.
Main Methods:
- Esophageal manometry with a rapid drink challenge was performed on 570 patients.
- Diagnostic outcomes were analyzed according to Chicago classification 4.0 criteria.
- Functional luminal imaging probe data was used to establish cutoff values.
Main Results:
- The rapid drink challenge failed in 17.9% of patients.
- Chicago classification 4.0 led to diagnostic reclassifications in 55.0% of patients previously diagnosed with esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction.
- The diagnostic cutoff for rapid drink challenge-integrated relaxation pressure was determined to be 19 mmHg.
Conclusions:
- Chicago classification 4.0 slightly increased the diagnostic yield of the rapid drink challenge.
- The rapid drink challenge exhibits a high failure rate, questioning its routine application.
- An individualized approach to esophageal manometry is advised due to the rapid drink challenge's limitations.
More Related Videos
08:05A Prediction Error-driven Retrieval Procedure for Destabilizing and Rewriting Maladaptive Reward Memories in Hazardous Drinkers
Published on: January 5, 2018
05:40The Motivation for Alcohol Reward: Predictors of Progressive-Ratio Intravenous Alcohol Self-Administration in Humans
Published on: April 28, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Urine Studies II: Urine Culture and Sensitivity Test
Automated Microbial Diagnostics