Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

83
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
83
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

146
Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This...
146
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis01:23

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

31
Mechanistic models are utilized in individual analysis using single-source data, but imperfections arise due to data collection errors, preventing perfect prediction of observed data. The mathematical equation involves known values (Xi), observed concentrations (Ci), measurement errors (εi), model parameters (ϕj), and the related function (ƒi) for i number of values. Different least-squares metrics quantify differences between predicted and observed values. The ordinary least...
31
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

156
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
156
Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data01:16

Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data

116
Statistical inference techniques, paramount in hypothesis testing, differentiate into two broad categories: parametric and nonparametric statistics.
Parametric statistics, as the name suggests, assumes that data follow a specific distribution, often a normal distribution. This assumption enables robust hypothesis testing and estimation. Parametric methods, like the Student's t-test or Goodness-of-fit test, are frequently employed in biostatistics due to their robustness. For instance,...
116
Censoring Survival Data01:09

Censoring Survival Data

68
Survival analysis is a statistical method used to analyze time-to-event data, often employed in fields such as medicine, engineering, and social sciences. One of the key challenges in survival analysis is dealing with incomplete data, a phenomenon known as "censoring." Censoring occurs when the event of interest (such as death, relapse, or system failure) has not occurred for some individuals by the end of the study period or is otherwise unobservable, and it might have many different...
68

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Assessing Racial Disparities in Healthcare Expenditures via Mediator Distribution Shifts.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same author

Addressing the influence of unmeasured confounding in observational studies with time-to-event outcomes: a semiparametric sensitivity analysis approach.

Biostatistics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same author

Causal K-Means Clustering.

Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B, Statistical methodology·2026
Same author

Target trial emulation without matching: a more efficient approach for evaluating vaccine effectiveness using observational data.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same author

Naloxone Prescribing and Naloxone Administration in Response to Overdose Events Among Women With Opioid Use Disorder During Pregnancy and Postpartum Period - MAT-LINK, Seven Clinical Sites, 2014-2021.

Journal of addiction medicine·2026
Same author

Environmental Chemicals as Modifiers of the Association between Age and Ovarian Reserve.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 10, 2025

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

6.9K

Semiparametric sensitivity analysis: unmeasured confounding in observational studies.

Razieh Nabi1, Matteo Bonvini2, Edward H Kennedy3

  • 1Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, United States.

Biometrics
|October 14, 2024
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a robust method to assess causal effects from observational data, even with unmeasured confounding. The new approach enhances the reliability of findings from non-experimental studies.

Keywords:
causal inferenceinfluence functionsplit sample estimationtruncation

More Related Videos

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.4K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 10, 2025

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

6.9K
Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.4K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.0K

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Biostatistics
  • Causal Inference

Background:

  • Observational studies often face challenges in establishing cause-effect relationships due to potential unmeasured confounding.
  • Assessing the robustness of conclusions from non-experimental studies to unmeasured confounders is critical for reliable scientific evidence.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To generalize existing sensitivity analysis methods for estimating the average causal effect (ACE).
  • To develop a robust statistical framework for causal inference from observational data, addressing unmeasured confounding.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized semiparametric theory to derive the non-parametric efficient influence function for the ACE.
  • Developed a one-step, split-sample, truncated estimator based on the derived influence function.
  • The proposed estimator accommodates semiparametric models without restricting sensitivity parameters and ensures $\sqrt{n}$ asymptotics under sufficient conditions.

Main Results:

  • The methodology provides a generalized sensitivity analysis framework for the average causal effect (ACE).
  • A novel one-step estimator was developed and shown to have $\sqrt{n}$ asymptotic properties.
  • The approach was applied to investigate the causal effect of smoking during pregnancy on birth weight, with performance evaluated via simulation.

Conclusions:

  • The developed methodology offers a robust approach to causal inference in the presence of unmeasured confounding.
  • The new estimator enhances the reliability of conclusions drawn from observational studies.
  • The application to smoking and birth weight demonstrates the practical utility of the proposed causal inference technique.