Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 10, 2025

In Vitro Directed Evolution of a Restriction Endonuclease with More Stringent Specificity
Published on: March 25, 2020
Effects of selection stringency on the outcomes of directed evolution
Berk A Alpay1,2, Michael M Desai1,2,3
1Systems, Synthetic, and Quantitative Biology Program, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, United States of America.
Abstract:
Directed evolution makes mutant lineages compete in climbing complicated sequence-function landscapes. Given this underlying complexity it is unclear how selection stringency, a ubiquitous parameter of directed evolution, impacts the outcome. Here we approach this question in terms of the fitnesses of the candidate variants at each round and the heterogeneity of their distributions of fitness effects. We show that even if the fittest mutant is most likely to yield the fittest mutants in the next round of selection, diversification can improve outcomes by sampling a larger variety of fitness effects. We find that heterogeneity in fitness effects between variants, larger population sizes, and evolution over a greater number of rounds all encourage diversification.
Related Concept Videos
Types of Selection
Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?
In contrast, regions which code...
Limits to Natural Selection
Mutation, Gene Flow, and Genetic Drift
Genetic Drift
Frequency-dependent Selection

