Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 10, 2025
09:16
In Vitro Directed Evolution of a Restriction Endonuclease with More Stringent Specificity
Published on: March 25, 2020
7.2K
Effects of selection stringency on the outcomes of directed evolution.
Berk A Alpay1,2, Michael M Desai1,2,3
1Systems, Synthetic, and Quantitative Biology Program, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, United States of America.
Plos One
|October 14, 2024
Summary
Directed evolution uses competition to navigate complex sequence-function landscapes. Diversification, influenced by fitness effect heterogeneity, population size, and evolution rounds, can improve outcomes by exploring more fitness effects.
Area of Science:
- Biotechnology
- Molecular Biology
- Evolutionary Biology
Background:
- Directed evolution is a powerful method for protein engineering.
- Understanding how selection stringency affects outcomes is crucial.
- Sequence-function landscapes are inherently complex.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the impact of selection stringency on directed evolution outcomes.
- To analyze the role of fitness effect heterogeneity in diversification.
- To determine factors that encourage diversification in directed evolution.
Main Methods:
- Analyzing fitness of candidate variants across selection rounds.
- Quantifying the heterogeneity of fitness effect distributions.
- Modeling the competition dynamics of mutant lineages.
Main Results:
- Diversification can improve directed evolution outcomes by sampling diverse fitness effects.
- Heterogeneity in fitness effects between variants promotes diversification.
- Larger population sizes and more evolution rounds also encourage diversification.
Conclusions:
- Selection stringency's impact is better understood by considering fitness distributions.
- Diversification is a key strategy for navigating complex sequence-function landscapes.
- Factors like heterogeneity, population size, and duration promote beneficial diversification.
Related Concept Videos
01:46Types of Selection
40.2K
Natural selection influences the frequencies of particular alleles and phenotypes within populations in several different ways. Primarily, natural selection can be directional, stabilizing, or disruptive. Directional selection favors one extreme trait and shifts the population towards that phenotype while selecting against individuals displaying alternate traits. Stabilizing selection favors an intermediate trait with a narrow range of variation. Deviation from the optimal phenotype towards an...
40.2K
02:05Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?
7.0K
The genomes of eukaryotes are punctuated by long stretches of sequence which do not code for proteins or RNAs. Although some of these regions do contain crucial regulatory sequences, the vast majority of this DNA serves no known function. Typically, these regions of the genome are the ones in which the fastest change, in evolutionary terms, is observed, because there is typically little to no selection pressure acting on these regions to preserve their sequences.
In contrast, regions which code...
In contrast, regions which code...
7.0K
01:38Limits to Natural Selection
31.2K
Organisms that are well-adapted to their environment are more likely to survive and reproduce. However, natural selection does not lead to perfectly adapted organisms. Several factors constrain natural selection.
31.2K
01:09Mutation, Gene Flow, and Genetic Drift
58.2K
In a population that is not at Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, the frequency of alleles changes over time. Therefore, any deviations from the five conditions of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium can alter the genetic variation of a given population. Conditions that change the genetic variability of a population include mutations, natural selection, non-random mating, gene flow, and genetic drift (small population size).
58.2K
03:33Genetic Drift
39.5K
Natural selection—probably the most well-known evolutionary mechanism—increases the prevalence of traits that enhance survival and reproduction. However, evolution does not merely propagate favorable traits, nor does it always benefit populations.
39.5K
01:21Frequency-dependent Selection
21.9K
When the fitness of a trait is influenced by how common it is (i.e., its frequency) relative to different traits within a population, this is referred to as frequency-dependent selection. Frequency-dependent selection may occur between species or within a single species. This type of selection can either be positive—with more common phenotypes having higher fitness—or negative, with rarer phenotypes conferring increased fitness.
21.9K