Meta-Analysis of Interobserver Agreement in Assessment of Interstitial Lung Disease Using High-Resolution CT

Liam Delaney1, Samer Alabed1, Ahmed Maiter1

  • 1From the Division of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Glossop Rd, Sheffield, United Kingdom, S10 2JF (L.D., S.A., A.M., E.C., A.J.S., K.D.); Department of Radiology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, United Kingdom (S.A., A.M., M.S., S.M., M.K., O.E., S.R., C.J., A.J.S., K.D.); NIHR Sheffield Biomedical Research Centre, Sheffield, United Kingdom (S.A., A.J.S., K.D.); Chesterfield Royal Hospital, Chesterfield Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Chesterfield, United Kingdom (M.G.); College of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (H.S.); and Department of Radiology, Papworth Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom (N.J.S.).

Radiology
|October 15, 2024
PubMed
Summary

Radiologists show moderate agreement on interstitial lung disease (ILD) imaging features and usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) patterns. However, evidence is limited for assessing ILD severity, extent, or progression.