Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 10, 2025
Absorption of Nasal and Bronchial Fluids: Precision Sampling of the Human Respiratory Mucosa and Laboratory Processing of Samples
Published on: January 21, 2018
Microplastics in different nasal irrigation options
1Infectious Disease and Clinical Microbiology, Medical Faculty, Kırıkkale University, Kırıkkale, Turkey. draaslan87@gmail.com.
Purpose:
We aimed to assess the presence of microplastics in nasal irrigation methods commonly used in the treatment of sinusitis and rhinitis, and to evaluate human exposure.
Methods:
A total of 150 samples were included in the study, consisting of nasal wash bottles containing nasal irrigation solution, seawater spray, syringes for nasal irrigation with isotonic solution. The amount of microplastics per millilitre in the samples and patient exposure during single use were assessed separately for each method and product. All samples were filtered using a stainless steel vacuum filter on filter paper with a pore size of 1.2 μm, washed at least three times with distilled water and incubated at 45 °C for 24 h to prevent mould growth. Identification and counting of microplastics was performed using a Leica Flexacam C1 camera connected to an M80 stereomicroscope. The presence of microplastics was confirmed by the hot needle method and Nile red staining.
Results:
An average of 6.49 ± 13.08 microplastics/product was detected in all filtered samples. The lowest microplastic count was 0 microplastics/product in syringes and the highest was 92 microplastics/product in nasal wash bottles. Significant differences in the amount of microplastics individuals were exposed to during a single use were found between nasal wash bottles and seawater brands, while no significant differences were found between syringe brands. When nasal wash kits, seawater sprays and isotonic nasal rinses were evaluated separately, significant differences were found in the number of microplastics, the microplastics/ml ratio and the number of microplastics exposed during a single use. The highest microplastic exposure was found in nasal irrigation bottles.
Conclusion:
The exposure of individuals to microplastics increases with medical support treatments, regardless of intranasal or intravenous administration. Due to the inflammation, oxidative stress and proliferation caused by microplastics, new regulations and inspections of production conditions should be implemented worldwide to reduce exposure.
Insights
Microplastics are present in nasal irrigation products, with nasal wash bottles showing the highest exposure. This finding highlights potential health risks associated with these common medical treatments.
Area of Science:
- Environmental Science
- Materials Science
- Medical Devices
Background:
- Sinusitis and rhinitis are common conditions often treated with nasal irrigation.
- Microplastic contamination is a growing global concern across various environments.
- The potential health impacts of microplastics necessitate investigation in medical applications.
Purpose of the Study:
- To quantify microplastics in nasal irrigation products.
- To assess human exposure to microplastics via these methods.
- To compare microplastic levels across different nasal irrigation product types.
Main Methods:
- Analyzed 150 samples: nasal wash bottles, seawater sprays, and syringes.
- Filtered samples and identified microplastics using microscopy and chemical staining.
- Calculated microplastic load per product and per milliliter for exposure assessment.
Main Results:
- Detected an average of 6.49 microplastics/product across all samples.
- Nasal wash bottles exhibited the highest microplastic levels (up to 92/product).
- Significant differences in microplastic exposure were found between product types.
Conclusions:
- Nasal irrigation treatments can increase microplastic exposure.
- Microplastics may cause inflammation and oxidative stress.
- Stricter regulations and production oversight are needed to minimize microplastic exposure.
