Combined left atrial appendage occlusion and catheter ablation procedure for left atrial arrhythmias: A real-world,

Stefan Preisendörfer1, Muhammad T Ayub1, Aakash Sheth1

  • 1Heart & Vascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

Insights

Combined percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) and catheter ablation (CA) demonstrate similar safety and efficacy compared to LAAO alone. This real-world study found comparable outcomes in major complications, thrombosis, and mortality between the two procedures.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Interventional Cardiology
  • Electrophysiology

Background:

  • Limited real-world data exists comparing combined left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) and catheter ablation (CA) with LAAO alone.
  • Assessing the safety and efficacy of combined procedures is crucial for optimizing patient care.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the safety and efficacy of combined LAAO and CA versus LAAO alone in a large real-world patient cohort.
  • To evaluate in-hospital complications, device-related outcomes, and clinical events at 6-month follow-up.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of patients undergoing combined LAAO and CA versus LAAO alone from a large US hospital system (8/2020-2/2024).
  • Propensity score matching (1:2 ratio) was used to control for baseline characteristics, including device type, CHA2DS2-VASc, and HAS-BLED scores.
  • Outcomes assessed included procedural success, in-hospital complications, peri-device leak, device thrombosis, all-cause mortality, thromboembolic events, and bleeding events.

Main Results:

  • Successful LAAO implantation rates were identical (95.8%) in both groups.
  • In-hospital major and minor complications were similar between combined and LAAO-alone groups.
  • At 45 days and 6 months, peri-device leak, device-related thrombosis, all-cause mortality, thromboembolic, and bleeding events were comparable between the groups.

Conclusions:

  • Combined LAAO and CA is a safe and effective strategy with comparable outcomes to LAAO alone.
  • The findings support the use of combined procedures when indicated, offering similar safety profiles.
  • Further prospective studies may further elucidate long-term benefits and specific patient selection criteria.
Abstract