Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 10, 2025

Characterization and Application of Passive Samplers for Monitoring of Pesticides in Water
Published on: August 3, 2016
Systematic Comparison of Extract Clean-Up with Currently Used Sorbents for Dispersive Solid-Phase Extraction
Michelle Peter1, Christoph Müller1
1Department of Pharmacy, Center for Drug Research, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, 81377 Munich, Germany.
This study compares dispersive solid-phase extraction (dSPE) sorbents for multiresidue analysis. PSA sorbent demonstrated the best overall performance, balancing clean-up efficiency with analyte recovery across various food matrices.
Area of Science:
- Analytical Chemistry
- Environmental Chemistry
- Food Chemistry
Background:
- Dispersive solid-phase extraction (dSPE) is vital for multiresidue analysis, purifying extracts to prevent instrumental contamination and enhance method performance.
- Over-purification during dSPE can cause analyte loss through adsorption, necessitating careful sorbent selection.
- Evaluating established and novel dSPE sorbents is crucial for optimizing analytical methods.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically compare the clean-up capacity and analyte recovery of various dSPE sorbents.
- To assess the performance of PSA, GCB, C18, chitin, chitosan, MWCNT, and Z-Sep® sorbents.
- To determine the impact of different sorbents on the recovery of 98 analytes in diverse food matrices.
Main Methods:
- Systematic comparison of dSPE sorbents including PSA, GCB, C18, chitin, chitosan, MWCNT, and Z-Sep®.
- Assessment of clean-up capacity via visual inspection, UV, and GC-MS measurements.
- Determination of analyte recovery rates for 98 compounds using GC-MS/MS in spinach, orange, avocado, salmon, and bovine liver matrices.
Main Results:
- Z-Sep® exhibited the highest clean-up capacity, reducing matrix components by a median of 50% in UV and GC-MS measurements.
- Multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) significantly impacted analyte recovery, with 14 analytes showing recoveries below 70%.
- PSA sorbent provided the best overall performance, balancing effective clean-up with minimal analyte loss.
Conclusions:
- PSA is the recommended sorbent for achieving optimal results in multiresidue analysis, offering a balance between matrix removal and analyte recovery.
- Sorbent selection critically influences both the purification efficiency and the accuracy of quantitative analysis in complex food samples.
- Novel sorbents like Z-Sep® show promise for matrix reduction, but potential analyte loss must be carefully managed.
More Related Videos
08:56Detection of Regulated Ergot Alkaloids in Food Matrices by Liquid Chromatography-Trapped Ion Mobility Spectrometry-Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry
Published on: November 22, 2024
07:26A Simple Method for Automated Solid Phase Extraction of Water Samples for Immunological Analysis of Small Pollutants
Published on: January 1, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Sample Preparation for Analysis: Overview
Bulk or large solid samples are typically reduced in size using grinding, crushing, or milling techniques to increase the...
Size-Exclusion Chromatography
Silica particles offer advantages such as rigidity,...
Analyte Adsorption and Distribution
Capillary Electrophoresis: Applications
Capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE) separates ionic components based on their electrophoretic mobility. It has been used to separate proteins, amino acids,...
Extraction: Advanced Methods
Sampling Methods: Sample Types
Solid samples include a variety of substances, such as sediments from water bodies, soil, metals, and biological tissues. Two standard methods for extracting sediments from water bodies are grab sampling and piston coring. Grab sampling involves using a device to collect a discrete sediment sample from the bottom of a water body with minimal disturbance. Grab samples do not always represent the entire area due to...