Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 10, 2025

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Multiple Sclerosis at 7.0 Tesla
Published on: February 19, 2021
Multicenter validation of automated detection of paramagnetic rim lesions on brain MRI in multiple sclerosis
Luyun Chen1,2, Zheng Ren1, Kelly A Clark1
1Penn Statistics in Imaging and Visualization Center, Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Background And Purpose:
Paramagnetic rim lesions (PRLs) are an MRI biomarker of chronic inflammation in people with multiple sclerosis (MS). PRLs may aid in the diagnosis and prognosis of MS. However, manual identification of PRLs is time-consuming and prone to poor interrater reliability. To address these challenges, the Automated Paramagnetic Rim Lesion (APRL) algorithm was developed to automate PRL detection. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of APRL for detecting PRLs in a multicenter setting.
Methods:
We applied APRL to a multicenter dataset, which included 3-Tesla MRI acquired in 92 participants (43 with MS, 14 with clinically isolated syndrome [CIS]/radiologically isolated syndrome [RIS], 35 without RIS/CIS/MS). Subsequently, we assessed APRL's performance by comparing its results with manual PRL assessments carried out by a team of trained raters.
Results:
Among the 92 participants, expert raters identified 5637 white matter lesions and 148 PRLs. The automated segmentation method successfully captured 115 (78%) of the manually identified PRLs. Within these 115 identified lesions, APRL differentiated between manually identified PRLs and non-PRLs with an area under the curve (AUC) of .73 (95% confidence interval [CI]: [.68, .78]). At the subject level, the count of APRL-identified PRLs predicted MS diagnosis with an AUC of .69 (95% CI: [.57, .81]).
Conclusion:
Our study demonstrated APRL's capability to differentiate between PRLs and lesions without paramagnetic rims in a multicenter study. Automated identification of PRLs offers greater efficiency over manual identification and could facilitate large-scale assessments of PRLs in clinical trials.
Insights
The Automated Paramagnetic Rim Lesion (APRL) algorithm accurately detects paramagnetic rim lesions (PRLs) in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. This automated method improves efficiency for large-scale clinical trial assessments.
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Radiology
- Biomarker Discovery
Background:
- Paramagnetic rim lesions (PRLs) are key MRI biomarkers for chronic inflammation in multiple sclerosis (MS).
- Manual identification of PRLs is labor-intensive and lacks interrater reliability.
- Automated detection of PRLs is needed for efficient diagnosis and prognosis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the accuracy of the Automated Paramagnetic Rim Lesion (APRL) algorithm for detecting PRLs.
- To assess APRL's performance in a multicenter setting for multiple sclerosis (MS) diagnosis.
Main Methods:
- The APRL algorithm was applied to a multicenter 3-Tesla MRI dataset of 92 participants.
- APRL performance was compared against manual PRL assessments by trained raters.
- Statistical analysis included area under the curve (AUC) for lesion and subject-level predictions.
Main Results:
- APRL successfully identified 78% of manually detected PRLs.
- The algorithm differentiated PRLs from non-PRLs with an AUC of 0.73.
- APRL-identified PRL counts predicted MS diagnosis with an AUC of 0.69.
Conclusions:
- The APRL algorithm accurately differentiates PRLs from other lesions in a multicenter setting.
- Automated PRL identification offers enhanced efficiency compared to manual methods.
- APRL can facilitate large-scale assessments in clinical trials for MS.
More Related Videos
12:50Lesion Explorer: A Video-guided, Standardized Protocol for Accurate and Reliable MRI-derived Volumetrics in Alzheimer's Disease and Normal Elderly
Published on: April 14, 2014
10:25Brain Infarct Segmentation and Registration on MRI or CT for Lesion-symptom Mapping
Published on: September 25, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System IV: CMRI