Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error00:59

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

654
An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
654
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

486
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
486
Uncertainty: Overview00:59

Uncertainty: Overview

526
In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.
526
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

3.1K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
3.1K
Prediction Intervals01:03

Prediction Intervals

2.2K
The interval estimate of any variable is known as the prediction interval. It helps decide if a point estimate is dependable.
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y. 
2.2K
End Point Prediction: Gran Plot01:07

End Point Prediction: Gran Plot

285
A Gran plot is used to predict the equivalence volume or endpoint of a potentiometric or acid-base titration without reaching the endpoint. Typically, titration data is collected as a function of the titrant's volume up to a point less than the equivalence volume and then transformed into a linear format. The straight line is extended to the x-axis, indicating the necessary titrant volume to achieve the equivalence point.
For potentiometric titration, the Gran plot is created by plotting...
285

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

AEROS: AdaptivE RObust Least-Squares for Graph-Based SLAM.

Frontiers in robotics and AI·2022
Same author

Pronto: A Multi-Sensor State Estimator for Legged Robots in Real-World Scenarios.

Frontiers in robotics and AI·2021
Same author

The Future of Health Care: Protocol for Measuring the Potential of Task Automation Grounded in the National Health Service Primary Care System.

JMIR research protocols·2019
Same author

Accurate and robust localization for walking robots fusing kinematics, inertial, vision and LIDAR.

Interface focus·2018
Same journal

Planned synchronization for multi-robot systems with active observations.

Autonomous robots·2025
Same journal

Distributed spatial awareness for robot swarms.

Autonomous robots·2025
Same journal

That was not what I was aiming at! Differentiating human intent and outcome in a physically dynamic throwing task.

Autonomous robots·2022
Same journal

Hierarchical planning with state abstractions for temporal task specifications.

Autonomous robots·2022
Same journal

AlphaPilot: autonomous drone racing.

Autonomous robots·2022
Same journal

A new meta-module design for efficient reconfiguration of modular robots.

Autonomous robots·2021
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 10, 2025

The Modular Design and Production of an Intelligent Robot Based on a Closed-Loop Control Strategy
11:53

The Modular Design and Production of an Intelligent Robot Based on a Closed-Loop Control Strategy

Published on: October 14, 2017

11.6K

Planning under uncertainty for safe robot exploration using Gaussian process prediction.

Alex Stephens1, Matthew Budd1, Michal Staniaszek1

  • 1Oxford Robotics Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Autonomous Robots
|October 18, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a new framework for safe robot exploration in unknown environments. It uses Gaussian processes and Markov decision processes to ensure robots stay within safe operational limits while mapping new areas.

Keywords:
Gaussian processesMarkov decision processesMobile robotsSafe exploration

More Related Videos

Visualization Method for Proprioceptive Drift on a 2D Plane Using Support Vector Machine
07:05

Visualization Method for Proprioceptive Drift on a 2D Plane Using Support Vector Machine

Published on: October 27, 2016

9.2K
WheelCon: A Wheel Control-Based Gaming Platform for Studying Human Sensorimotor Control
08:18

WheelCon: A Wheel Control-Based Gaming Platform for Studying Human Sensorimotor Control

Published on: August 15, 2020

4.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 10, 2025

The Modular Design and Production of an Intelligent Robot Based on a Closed-Loop Control Strategy
11:53

The Modular Design and Production of an Intelligent Robot Based on a Closed-Loop Control Strategy

Published on: October 14, 2017

11.6K
Visualization Method for Proprioceptive Drift on a 2D Plane Using Support Vector Machine
07:05

Visualization Method for Proprioceptive Drift on a 2D Plane Using Support Vector Machine

Published on: October 27, 2016

9.2K
WheelCon: A Wheel Control-Based Gaming Platform for Studying Human Sensorimotor Control
08:18

WheelCon: A Wheel Control-Based Gaming Platform for Studying Human Sensorimotor Control

Published on: August 15, 2020

4.9K

Area of Science:

  • Robotics
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Environmental Science

Background:

  • Mobile robot exploration is vital for mapping unknown areas.
  • Ensuring robot safety within predefined environmental condition thresholds (e.g., terrain steepness, radiation) is a significant challenge.
  • Existing methods often struggle with simultaneous mapping and safe exploration.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a novel framework for safe exploration in unknown environments for mobile robots.
  • To address two scenarios: known map with unknown safety features, and unknown map with unknown safety features.
  • To enable robots to build maps while adhering to safety constraints.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized Gaussian processes for predicting environmental feature values in unvisited regions.
  • Developed a Markov decision process integrating Gaussian process predictions and environmental model transition probabilities.
  • Incorporated the Markov decision process into an exploration algorithm prioritizing information gain, predicted safety, and proximity.

Main Results:

  • The proposed framework effectively guides robots to explore new regions while maintaining safety.
  • Empirical evaluations through simulations demonstrated the framework's efficacy.
  • Successful application on a physical robot in an underground environment validated the approach.

Conclusions:

  • The developed framework provides a robust solution for safe exploration in complex, unknown environments.
  • This approach enhances robot autonomy and operational safety in challenging terrains.
  • The integration of predictive modeling and decision-making processes offers a promising direction for future robotic exploration systems.