Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 10, 2025

11:47
Evaluation of the Efficacy of Organic Peroxyacids for Eradicating Dairy Biofilms Using an Approach Combining Static and Dynamic Methods
Published on: December 9, 2022
1.6K
The Decontamination Effect of an Oscillating Chitosan Brush Compared With an Ultrasonic PEEK-Tip: An In Vitro Study
Sadia Nazir Khan1, Honorato Ribeiro-Vidal2,3, Leire Virto3,4
1Department of Prosthetics and Oral Function, Faculty of Dentistry, Institute of Clinical Dentistry, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Clinical Oral Implants Research
|October 19, 2024
Summary
The ultrasonic device with PEEK tip (US-PEEK) effectively reduced peri-implant biofilm, outperforming the oscillating chitosan brush (OCB). US-PEEK showed greater efficacy in reducing bacterial load on SLA surfaces compared to OCB on machined surfaces.
Area of Science:
- Dental Implantology
- Microbiology
- Biomaterials Science
Background:
- Peri-implantitis poses a significant challenge in dental implantology.
- Effective mechanical decontamination of implant surfaces is crucial for managing peri-implantitis.
- Novel devices are being developed to improve biofilm removal efficacy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy of an oscillating chitosan brush (OCB) and an ultrasonic device with PEEK tip (US-PEEK) for mechanical implant surface decontamination.
- To evaluate the impact of these devices on multispecies biofilms in a 3D in vitro model.
- To assess bacterial reduction on different implant surface types (machined vs. SLA).
Main Methods:
- A validated dynamic multispecies biofilm model was established on dental implants with machined and sandblasted, large-grit, acid-etched (SLA) surfaces.
- Implants were placed in 3D models simulating peri-implant defects.
- Mechanical decontamination was performed for 120 seconds using either OCB or US-PEEK devices.
- Bacterial composition and load were analyzed using Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and quantitative PCR (qPCR).
Main Results:
- Well-structured biofilms were observed on untreated control implants.
- The US-PEEK group demonstrated a significant reduction in bacterial species compared to the OCB and control groups (p < 0.05).
- The OCB group showed a biofilm removal effect specifically on machined implant surfaces, while US-PEEK was effective on SLA surfaces.
Conclusions:
- Mechanical decontamination using US-PEEK and OCB effectively reduced peri-implant biofilm in an in vitro 3D model.
- The US-PEEK device exhibited superior efficacy in reducing overall bacterial numbers compared to the OCB.
- Different implant surface topographies influenced the effectiveness of each decontamination method.

