Endovascular and Hybrid Interventions for Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease in Patients with Intermittent Claudication
Levester Kirksey1, Khaled I Alnahhal1, Ahmed A Sorour1
1Department of Vascular Surgery, Heart Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
Insights
Endovascular therapy for complex aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD) with or without common femoral endarterectomy (CFE) is safe and effective for intermittent claudication (IC). This approach offers durable outcomes, justifying its use in patients with advanced disease.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Surgery
- Endovascular Interventions
- Peripheral Artery Disease
Background:
- Intermittent claudication (IC) management varies significantly across different arterial segments.
- Aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD) presents complex challenges in treatment selection.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the safety, efficacy, and durability of endovascular treatment for complex AIOD in patients with IC.
- To compare outcomes of endovascular procedures with or without common femoral endarterectomy (CFE).
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 245 limbs in 180 patients treated for AIOD with endovascular approaches (2010-2020).
- Inclusion criteria: symptoms of IC. Outcomes assessed: complications, patency rates, and freedom from re-intervention.
- Subgroup analysis compared endovascular-only versus hybrid endovascular and CFE procedures.
Main Results:
- Low complication rates: 7.4% access site, 7.9% wound complications, 0.82% amputation.
- Excellent patency rates: 1-year (94%), 2-year (77%), 5-year (58%) primary; 1-year (98%), 2-year (91%), 5-year (79%) primary-assisted.
- Hybrid approach with CFE showed low morbidity and excellent vessel patency, with a trend towards improved outcomes.
Conclusions:
- Endovascular management of complex AIOD with or without CFE is a safe, effective, and durable option for IC patients.
- This approach supports active, patient-centered management for advanced AIOD.
- Careful patient selection is crucial for optimal outcomes in this patient population.
Background:
Significant practice variability exists regarding the management of intermittent claudication (IC) across anatomic segments. We sought to answer the question of whether the safety, efficacy, and durability outcomes of an endovascular approach with or without common femoral endarterectomy for complex aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD) justify a surgical approach in patients presenting with IC.
Methods:
A retrospective single-center review of all patients who were treated using an endovascular approach for AIOD with or without common femoral artery endarterectomy (CFE) from 2010 to 2020 was conducted. The review was limited to those with symptoms of IC. Patient- and limb-level preoperative presentations were reviewed. The outcomes were postoperative complications and patency rates in addition to freedom from re-intervention. Subgroup analyses were conducted to compare patients who underwent endovascular and hybrid procedures.
Results:
A total of 245 limbs in 180 consecutive patients were analyzed. The mean age was 65 years, and 61% were males. Of 176 patients, 101 (57%) had trans-atlantic inter-society consensus (TASC) class D and 18 (10%) had class C. Eleven limbs (7.4%) had access site complications, 12 (7.9%) had surgical wound complications, and below-the-knee amputation was observed in 2 limbs (0.82%) (2 patients). Two (1.0%) patients had perioperative myocardial infarction (MI), 1 (0.5%) stroke, 1 (0.5%) AKI that progressed to dialysis, and no 30-day mortality. Rutherford's classification was improved during the follow-up period. The 1-, 2-, and 5-year primary patency rates were 94%, 77%, and 58%; primary-assisted patency rates were 98%, 91%, and 79%, respectively; and secondary patency rates were 100% for all follow-up periods. Patients who had concurrent CFE were likely to have hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and anatomically more diffuse disease. No significant differences in patency or reintervention-free survival were observed, though event rates were low in both outcomes and trended toward a protective effect with CFE.
Conclusions:
Endovascular management for complex AIOD with or without CFE for IC patients is safe, effective, and durable. These results justify an active, patient-centered approach for this advanced anatomic disease pattern. The morbidity of a hybrid approach in the CFE subset is low, and treatment vessel patency is excellent. The presence of anatomically advanced AIOD is not prohibitive for the treatment of patients with IC; however, careful patient selection is essential.
Related Concept Videos
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Arterial Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Evaluation
Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management
Coronary Artery Disease V: Surgical Management
Atherosclerosis III: Management


