Using artificial intelligence based imaging to predict lymph node metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer: a...

Lung cancer, especially non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), is one of the most-deadly malignancies worldwide. Lung cancer has a worse 5-year survival rate than many primary malignancies. Thus, the early detection and prognosis prediction of lung cancer are crucial. The early detection and prognosis prediction of lung cancer have improved with the widespread use of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies. This meta-analysis examined the accuracy and efficacy of AI-based models in predicting lymph node metastasis (LNM) in NSCLC patients using imaging data. Our findings could help clinicians predict patient prognosis and select alternative therapies.

We searched the PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases for relevant articles published up to January 31, 2024. Two reviewers individually evaluated all the retrieved articles to assess their eligibility for inclusion in the meta-analysis. The systematic assessment and meta-analysis comprised articles that satisfied the inclusion criteria (e.g., randomized or non-randomized trials, and observational studies) and exclusion criteria (e.g., articles not published in English), and provided data for the quantitative synthesis. The quality of the included articles was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2). The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) were used to evaluate the ability of AI-based imaging models to predict LNM in NSCLC patients. Sources of heterogeneity were investigated using meta-regression. Covariates, including country, sample size, imaging modality, model validation technique, and model algorithm, were examined in the subgroup analysis.

The final meta-analysis comprised 11 retrospective studies of 6,088 NSCLC patients, of whom 1,483 had LNM. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of the AI-based imaging model for predicting LNM in NSCLC patients were 0.87 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.80-0.91], 0.85 (95% CI: 0.78-0.89), and 0.92 (95% CI: 0.90-0.94). Based on the QUADAS-2 results, a risk of bias was detected in the patient selection and diagnostic tests of the included articles. However, the quality of the included articles was generally acceptable. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were heterogeneous (I²>75%). The meta-regression and subgroup analyses showed that imaging modality [computed tomography (CT) or positron emission tomography (PET)/CT], and the neural network method model design significantly affected heterogeneity of this study. Models employing sample size data from a single center and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) method had greater sensitivity than other techniques. Using the Deek' s funnel plot, no publishing bias was found. The results of the sensitivity analysis showed that deleting each article one by one did not change the findings.

Imaging data models based on AI algorithms have good diagnostic accuracy in predicting LNM in patients with NSCLC and could be applied in clinical settings.