Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Confidence Coefficient01:24

Confidence Coefficient

7.5K
The confidence coefficient is also known as the confidence level or degree of confidence. It is the percent expression for the probability, 1-α, that the confidence interval contains the true population parameter assuming that the confidence interval is obtained after sufficient unbiased sampling; for example, if the CL = 90%, then in 90 out of 100 samples the interval estimate will enclose the true population parameter. Here α is the area under the curve, distributed equally under...
7.5K
Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

93
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
93
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

4.0K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
4.0K
Groupthink01:34

Groupthink

44.2K
When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...
44.2K
Self-Help Support Groups01:28

Self-Help Support Groups

27
Self-help support groups are voluntary, community-based organizations that provide a platform for individuals with shared concerns to exchange support, insights, and practical strategies for coping with life challenges. Typically led by group members or paraprofessionals, these groups form a cornerstone of mental health care, especially in reaching populations that are underserved by traditional healthcare systems.
Accessibility and Cost-Effectiveness
One of the primary strengths of self-help...
27
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

5.3K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
5.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Sensory horizons, reality monitoring, and the higher-order nature of consciousness: A critical look.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same author

Confidence in naturalistic decision making.

Neuroscience of consciousness·2026
Same author

How foundation models will revolutionize robot swarms.

Science robotics·2026
Same author

Frequency-tagging as a measure of conscious face perception.

Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior·2026
Same author

Best-of-n decision making by human groups.

PloS one·2026
Same author

Exploring the role of micro-valence in the phenomenal space: insights from similarity judgments and deep learning models.

Neuroscience of consciousness·2026
Same journal

Bioactive carbon dots from peony seed meal for nanomedicine via circular economy.

iScience·2026
Same journal

Genetic ablation of <i>Sfxn5</i> induces mitochondrial dysfunction and precipitates lethal metabolic crisis in mice.

iScience·2026
Same journal

Expansion, functional diversification, and gene fusion events in the Ato protein family.

iScience·2026
Same journal

The pro-inflammatory cytokines IFN-α and TNF-α inhibit organoid-derived extravillous trophoblast invasion.

iScience·2026
Same journal

Urbanization compound pathways of global lung cancer incidence risk under proximal and distal interactions.

iScience·2026
Same journal

Capsid and integrase play essential apposing roles in viral ribonucleoprotein assembly during HIV-1 core morphogenesis.

iScience·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 10, 2025

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
06:18

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

Published on: October 20, 2022

2.0K

Action-based confidence sharing and collective decision making.

Nicolas Coucke1,2,3, Mary Katherine Heinrich2, Marco Dorigo2

  • 1Center for Research in Cognition and Neurosciences, Université libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.

Iscience
|October 21, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Researchers studied how groups make decisions when goals are unclear. Movement patterns reveal individual opinions and confidence, showing how people influence each other during joint action and collective decision-making.

Keywords:
Cognitive neurosciencePsychologySocial sciences

More Related Videos

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.3K
The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

5.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 10, 2025

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
06:18

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

Published on: October 20, 2022

2.0K
The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.3K
The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

5.7K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Science
  • Social Psychology
  • Human Movement Analysis

Background:

  • Joint action research investigates coordinated movement for shared objectives.
  • Collective decision-making in groups requires integrating environmental information and reaching consensus.
  • Nonverbal cues, like confidence levels, can facilitate group decision-making.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate confidence sharing during collective decision-making in human groups.
  • To determine if movement trajectories can reveal individual opinions and confidence levels.
  • To explore how movement features predict an individual's influence within a group.

Main Methods:

  • Studying movement trajectories of groups (2-4 individuals) jointly deciding on a goal.
  • Analyzing kinematic features of individual movement paths.
  • Correlating movement patterns with expressed opinions and confidence.

Main Results:

  • Opinions and confidence levels were distinguishable from individual movement trajectories.
  • Specific movement features predicted an individual's influence on the group's decision.
  • Movement analysis provides insights into confidence sharing dynamics.

Conclusions:

  • Movement trajectories offer a valid method for studying confidence sharing in human collective decision-making.
  • Understanding movement dynamics can enhance models of group coordination and consensus.
  • This approach opens new avenues for analyzing nonverbal communication in group contexts.