Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Groupthink01:34

Groupthink

44.2K
When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...
44.2K
Social Proof00:52

Social Proof

27.6K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
27.6K
Group Polarization01:01

Group Polarization

34.2K
Group polarization is the strengthening of an original group attitude following the discussion of views within a group (Teger & Pruitt, 1967). That is, if a group initially favors a viewpoint, after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint. Conversely, if the group was initially opposed to a viewpoint, group discussion would likely lead to stronger opposition.
34.2K
Bias01:22

Bias

3.7K
Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
3.7K
Social Loafing01:37

Social Loafing

34.7K
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
34.7K
Bullying02:04

Bullying

8.4K
A modern form of aggression is bullying. As you learn in your study of child development, socializing and playing with other children is beneficial for children’s psychological development. However, as you may have experienced as a child, not all play behavior has positive outcomes. Some children are aggressive and want to play roughly. Other children are selfish and do not want to share toys. One form of negative social interactions among children that has become a national concern is...
8.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Metaphors of AI indicate that people increasingly perceive AI as warm and human-like.

Communications psychology·2026
Same author

Americans overestimate how many social media users post harmful content.

PNAS nexus·2025
Same author

Reranking partisan animosity in algorithmic social media feeds alters affective polarization.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2025
Same author

Leveraging artificial intelligence-mediated communication for cancer prevention and control and drug addiction: A systematic review.

Translational behavioral medicine·2025
Same author

Person-Specific Analyses of Smartphone Use and Mental Health: Intensive Longitudinal Study.

JMIR formative research·2025
Same author

A Comparison of ChatGPT and Fine-Tuned Open Pre-Trained Transformers (OPT) Against Widely Used Sentiment Analysis Tools: Sentiment Analysis of COVID-19 Survey Data.

JMIR mental health·2024
Same journal

Confident judgments of (mis)information veracity are more, rather than less, accurate.

PNAS nexus·2026
Same journal

Can AI help reduce prejudice? Evaluating the effectiveness of AI-powered personalized persuasion on support for transgender rights.

PNAS nexus·2026
Same journal

A cultural explanation for parole decisions in the United States.

PNAS nexus·2026
Same journal

A transformer-based language model reveals developmental constraint and network complexity during zebrafish embryogenesis.

PNAS nexus·2026
Same journal

Dual phosphoregulatory mechanisms of condensin I revealed by biochemical reconstitution.

PNAS nexus·2026
Same journal

Vanin-1 deficiency enhances host tolerance to influenza infection by modulating cellular redox status.

PNAS nexus·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 10, 2025

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.3K

Collaboration, crowdsourcing, and misinformation.

Chenyan Jia1,2, Angela Yuson Lee2, Ryan C Moore2

  • 1College of Arts, Media and Design and Khoury College of Computer Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

PNAS Nexus
|October 21, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Groups are better than individuals at spotting online misinformation. However, the "wisdom of crowds" approach is more efficient for detecting fake news than active group collaboration.

Keywords:
collaborationgroup discussionlab experimentmisinformationsocial media

More Related Videos

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
06:18

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

Published on: October 20, 2022

2.0K
Leveraging CyVerse Resources for De Novo Comparative Transcriptomics of Underserved Non-model Organisms
10:41

Leveraging CyVerse Resources for De Novo Comparative Transcriptomics of Underserved Non-model Organisms

Published on: May 9, 2017

9.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 10, 2025

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.3K
The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
06:18

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

Published on: October 20, 2022

2.0K
Leveraging CyVerse Resources for De Novo Comparative Transcriptomics of Underserved Non-model Organisms
10:41

Leveraging CyVerse Resources for De Novo Comparative Transcriptomics of Underserved Non-model Organisms

Published on: May 9, 2017

9.2K

Area of Science:

  • Social Sciences
  • Psychology
  • Communication Studies

Background:

  • Humanity's collective ability to collaborate is a strength, yet detecting deception remains a significant weakness.
  • The proliferation of online misinformation poses a threat to public health and civic discourse, necessitating effective detection strategies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether group collaboration enhances the ability to detect online misinformation compared to individual assessment.
  • To compare the efficacy of active group collaboration against the
  • wisdom of crowds
  • method in identifying false social media posts.

Main Methods:

  • A laboratory experiment was conducted where participants evaluated the veracity of social media posts.
  • Participants worked either individually or as actively collaborating groups to identify credible news and misinformation.

Main Results:

  • Collaborative groups demonstrated higher accuracy in detecting false posts than individuals working alone.
  • Group collaboration did not yield significantly better accuracy than a simulated majority-based group, indicating the efficiency of the "wisdom of crowds".

Conclusions:

  • The "wisdom of crowds" appears to be a more efficient method for identifying online misinformation than active group collaboration.
  • Future research and policy should consider crowdsourcing or collective intelligence approaches over individual-focused strategies for combating misinformation.