Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 9, 2025

Assessment and Evaluation of the High Risk Neonate: The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale
Published on: August 25, 2014
Assessing Communication Impairments in a Rare Neurodevelopmental Disorder: The SCN2A Clinical Trials Readiness Study
Anne T Berg1, Amanda N Nili1, Lindsey Evans1
1FamilieSCN2A Foundation (ATB, SME, LSM), Longmeadow, MA; Department of Medical and Social Sciences (ANN, AJK), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine; Department of Psychology (LE), Illinois Institute of Technology; Department of Psychology (KCP, A.J. Kaiser AJEK), University of Illinois at Chicago; Institute for Innovations in Developmental Sciences (ELA), Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; and CLIRINX (GN), Dublin, Ireland.
Standardized scores are not suitable for assessing communication in SCN2A-related disorders (SCN2A-RDs). Alternative scoring methods and assessments demonstrate better measurement properties for SCN2A-RDs clinical trials.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Genetics
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- SCN2A-related disorders (SCN2A-RDs) cause severe impairments, including communication deficits.
- These deficits represent potential nonseizure outcomes for clinical trials.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the fitness for purpose of clinical instruments for assessing communication in SCN2A-RD participants.
- To compare standardized and alternative scoring methods, including out-of-age-range measures.
Main Methods:
- Cross-sectional and longitudinal study involving parents of children with SCN2A-RDs.
- Utilized Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale (VABS-3), ABAS, Communication Matrix, and CSBS.
- Analyzed floor/ceiling effects, reliability, discrimination, and sensitivity to clinical aspects.
Main Results:
- 84% of participants were ineffective communicators; standardized scores showed significant floor effects and poor discrimination.
- Alternative scores (e.g., Vineland GSV, ABAS, Matrix, CSBS raw scores) had minimal floor effects and better discrimination.
- Alternative scores were sensitive to epilepsy severity, unlike standardized scores which decreased longitudinally.
Conclusions:
- Age-standardized scores (e.g., Vineland SS) are not fit for purpose in SCN2A-RD clinical trials due to floor effects and insensitivity.
- Alternative scoring methods and assessments show superior measurement profiles for SCN2A-RDs.
- GSVs and alternative scores should be considered for future precision medicine trials in SCN2A-RDs and similar rare diseases.
More Related Videos
11:14A Novel Experimental and Analytical Approach to the Multimodal Neural Decoding of Intent During Social Interaction in Freely-behaving Human Infants
Published on: October 4, 2015
08:42A Familiarization Protocol Facilitates the Participation of Children with ASD in Electrophysiological Research
Published on: July 31, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Autism Spectrum Disorder
These core symptoms manifest differently among individuals, ranging from mild to severe. The disorder's complexity extends beyond its clinical presentation, encompassing a diverse range of biological, cognitive, and sociocultural influences.
Intellectual Disability
Role of Communication in the Nursing Process I: Assessment and Diagnosis
The nursing process considers the patient's emotional and physical well-being. The process can be repeated or stopped at any point if judged essential. Assessment is the first step in the nursing...