Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Planar Rigid-Body Motion01:22

Planar Rigid-Body Motion

413
Understanding the movement of a rigid body in planar motion involves recognizing that every particle within this body is traversing a path that maintains a consistent distance from a specific plane. This concept is fundamental in the study of physics and mechanical engineering, and it allows us to comprehend better how objects move in space.
Planar motion is typically divided into three distinct categories. The first is rectilinear translation, demonstrated by a subway train that moves along...
413
Kinematic Equations: Problem Solving01:15

Kinematic Equations: Problem Solving

11.9K
When analyzing one-dimensional motion with constant acceleration, the problem-solving strategy involves identifying the known quantities and choosing the appropriate kinematic equations to solve for the unknowns. Either one or two kinematic equations are needed to solve for the unknowns, depending on the known and unknown quantities. Generally, the number of equations required is the same as the number of unknown quantities in the given example. Two-body pursuit problems always require two...
11.9K
Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes-Problem Solving01:29

Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes-Problem Solving

389
Consider a crane whose telescopic boom rotates with an angular velocity of 0.04 rad/s and angular acceleration of 0.02 rad/s2. Along with the rotation, the boom also extends linearly with a uniform speed of 5 m/s. The extension of the boom is measured at point D, which is measured with respect to the fixed point C on the other end of the boom. For the given instant, the distance between points C and D is 60 meters.
Here, in order to determine the magnitude of velocity and acceleration for point...
389
One-Degree-of-Freedom System01:24

One-Degree-of-Freedom System

465
In mechanical engineering, one-degree-of-freedom systems form the basis of a wide range of electrical and mechanical components. Using these models, engineers can predict the behavior of various parts in a larger system, which gives them insight into how different forces interact with each other.
A one-degree-of-freedom system is defined by an independent variable that determines its state and behavior. One example of a one-degree-of-freedom system is a simple harmonic oscillator, such as a...
465
Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes01:25

Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes

448
Consider a component AB undergoing a linear motion. Along with a linear motion, point B also rotates around point A. To comprehend this complex movement, position vectors for both points A and B are established using a stationary reference frame.
However, to express the relative position of point B relative to point A, an additional frame of reference, denoted as x'y', is necessary. This additional frame not only translates but also rotates relative to the fixed frame, making it...
448
Kinematic Equations - II01:17

Kinematic Equations - II

9.4K
The second kinematic equation expresses the final position of an object in terms of its initial position, the distance traveled with the initial constant velocity, and the distance traveled due to a change in velocity. Similar to the first kinematic equation, this equation is also only valid when the acceleration is constant throughout the motion of an object.
Suppose a car merges into freeway traffic on a 200 m long ramp. If its initial velocity is 10 m/s and it accelerates at 2 m/s2, then the...
9.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Demonstrate once, execute on many: Kinematic intelligence for cross-robot skill transfer.

Science robotics·2026
Same author

A detachable crawling robotic hand.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Four-Handed Solo Laparoscopic Anastomosis with the Support of Supernumerary Robotic Arms.

Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference·2025
Same author

Quantitative Outcome-Oriented Assessment of Microsurgical Anastomosis.

Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference·2025
Same author

"Data will solve robotics and automation: True or false?": A debate.

Science robotics·2025
Same author

An objective skill assessment framework for microsurgical anastomosis based on ALI scores.

Acta neurochirurgica·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 9, 2025

MPI CyberMotion Simulator: Implementation of a Novel Motion Simulator to Investigate Multisensory Path Integration in Three Dimensions
09:46

MPI CyberMotion Simulator: Implementation of a Novel Motion Simulator to Investigate Multisensory Path Integration in Three Dimensions

Published on: May 10, 2012

12.6K

Reactive collision-free motion generation in joint space via dynamical systems and sampling-based MPC.

Mikhail Koptev1, Nadia Figueroa2, Aude Billard1

  • 1Learning Algorithms and Systems Laboratory (LASA), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland.

The International Journal of Robotics Research
|October 23, 2024
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a novel robot motion planning method combining dynamical systems (DS) with sampling-based Model Predictive Control (MPC). The approach effectively navigates robots around obstacles, even in complex environments, ensuring collision-free and reactive movements.

Keywords:
Motion and path planningcollision avoidancereactive and sensor-based planning

More Related Videos

Operation of the Collaborative Composite Manufacturing CCM System
10:09

Operation of the Collaborative Composite Manufacturing CCM System

Published on: October 1, 2019

6.6K
Subject-specific Musculoskeletal Model for Studying Bone Strain During Dynamic Motion
09:32

Subject-specific Musculoskeletal Model for Studying Bone Strain During Dynamic Motion

Published on: April 11, 2018

9.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 9, 2025

MPI CyberMotion Simulator: Implementation of a Novel Motion Simulator to Investigate Multisensory Path Integration in Three Dimensions
09:46

MPI CyberMotion Simulator: Implementation of a Novel Motion Simulator to Investigate Multisensory Path Integration in Three Dimensions

Published on: May 10, 2012

12.6K
Operation of the Collaborative Composite Manufacturing CCM System
10:09

Operation of the Collaborative Composite Manufacturing CCM System

Published on: October 1, 2019

6.6K
Subject-specific Musculoskeletal Model for Studying Bone Strain During Dynamic Motion
09:32

Subject-specific Musculoskeletal Model for Studying Bone Strain During Dynamic Motion

Published on: April 11, 2018

9.7K

Area of Science:

  • Robotics
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Control Systems

Background:

  • Dynamical System (DS) based motion planning provides reactive, collision-free paths but struggles with non-convex obstacles and high-dimensional spaces.
  • Sampling-based Model Predictive Control (MPC) generates collision-free paths but is computationally intensive and limited to quasi-reactive scenarios.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a robot motion planning approach that combines the strengths of DS and MPC for enhanced reactivity and obstacle avoidance in cluttered environments.
  • To enable robots to navigate complex, high-dimensional joint spaces while avoiding both static and dynamic obstacles.

Main Methods:

  • Modulating joint-space DS with obstacle-tangential velocity components derived from asynchronously generated MPC paths.
  • Utilizing MPC only when local minima are detected, reducing computational load.
  • Deflecting nominal DS with tangential velocity components to navigate around obstacles and escape local minima.

Main Results:

  • The proposed approach successfully avoids concave obstacles and maintains local attractor stability.
  • Demonstrated capability in both quasi-static and highly dynamic cluttered environments.
  • Validated through simulations and real-world experiments on a 7-DoF robot.

Conclusions:

  • The hybrid DS-MPC approach offers a robust solution for generating feasible, highly reactive, and collision-free robot motion in complex environments.
  • This method overcomes limitations of traditional DS and MPC techniques, particularly in scenarios with non-convex obstacles and dynamic changes.