Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 9, 2025

Setup and Execution Of the Blindfolded Code Training Exercise
Published on: March 29, 2019
Application of quality indicators and critical lessons learned assessment as a research approach for the evaluation
Thomas Wurmb1, Sebastian Kurz2, Gerhard Schwarzmann3
1Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency and Pain Medicine, Section Emergency and Disaster Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Oberdürrbacherstrasse 6, 97080, Würzburg, Germany. wurmb_t@ukw.de.
Abstract:
In Wuerzburg, Germany, a terrorist attack and a killing rampage occurred five years apart (2016 and 2021). Following a structured evaluation of the rescue mission in 2016, a bundle of quality indicators and ten "lessons learned" were defined. Aim of the presented study was to compare the two rescue missions and to critically review the lessons learned from 2016 for their implementation and feasibility. An interdisciplinary and inter-professional group of experts analyzed the data using predefined quality indicators. All lessons defined in 2016 were critically reviewed and qualified as either lessons learned or lessons identified. While seven out of ten lessons were successfully implemented after 2016 (lessons learned), three lessons didn´t work and were recategorized as lessons identified (communication, zoning and the mutual exchange of different tactical approaches). Our results demonstrate that the conclusions drawn in 2016 have helped to improve the performance of the rescue forces in 2021. In addition, the identified lessons are now the basis for further improving emergency and disaster preparedness. It is important to understand, that the process of preparedness improvement is not completed with the definition of lessons identified. These must first be integrated into response plans and then trained intensively. A lesson identified only becomes a lesson learned once it has been successfully applied.
Related Concept Videos
Applications of GIS: Disaster Management and Emergency Response
Quality Assurance
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Assumptions of Survival Analysis
Actuarial Approach
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...

