Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 9, 2025

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets
Published on: December 5, 2014
The Interaction Between the Production Effect and Serial Position in Recognition and Recall
Sébastien Gionet1, Dominic Guitard2, Jean Saint-Aubin1
1School of Psychology, Université de Moncton, New Brunswick, Canada.
Reading items aloud improves memory recall, but this production effect may come at a cost. This study investigated how production effects differ between recall and recognition memory tasks, revealing task-dependent memory processes.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Human Memory Research
Background:
- Items read aloud are better remembered than silently read items, a phenomenon known as the production effect.
- The production effect is often attributed to increased distinctiveness, but its potential costs, particularly in recall tasks, are debated.
- Existing models often assume recognition tasks benefit from production without cost, contrasting with recall tasks.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate whether the production effect in memory tasks incurs costs, specifically examining its interaction with serial position in both recall and recognition.
- To determine if task demands modulate basic memory processes underlying the production effect.
- To compare the production effect across different memory tasks (2AFC recognition, old-new recognition, serial recall) and list lengths.
Main Methods:
- Four experiments were conducted using participants who completed various memory tests.
- Memory tasks included a two-alternative forced-choice (2AFC) recognition test, an old-new recognition test, and an immediate serial recall test.
- List length was manipulated across experiments to assess its influence on the production effect.
Main Results:
- The production effect was generally larger at later serial positions in memory tasks.
- A crossover interaction between the production effect and serial position, observed in recall, was absent in recognition tasks.
- Despite list length manipulations, recognition tasks did not show the same cost-benefit pattern as recall tasks.
Conclusions:
- Task-specific differences in the production effect highlight how task demands can modulate fundamental memory processes.
- The absence of a crossover interaction in recognition suggests distinct memory mechanisms are engaged compared to recall.
- Understanding these task-related modulations is crucial for a comprehensive theory of human memory.
Related Concept Videos
Serial Position Effect
Predicting Products: SN1 vs. SN2
With increased substitution on the alkyl halide,...
Interference and Decay
Interference occurs when competing memories hinder the retrieval of particular information. It can be classified into two types: proactive and retroactive interference. Proactive...
Chunking and Rehearsal in Sensory Memory
Parameters Affecting Nonlinear Elimination: Zero-Order Input, First-Order Absorption and Two-Compartment Model
When a drug is administered through a constant intravenous infusion and eliminated via nonlinear pharmacokinetics, it follows zero-order input. For example, oral drugs undergo first-order absorption upon administration and are eliminated through nonlinear pharmacokinetics.
In the case of subcutaneously administered drugs,...
Production Efficiency

