Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Frustration and Conflict: Approach-Approach, Approach-Avoidance01:20

Frustration and Conflict: Approach-Approach, Approach-Avoidance

47
Frustration occurs when people are obstructed or prevented from achieving a desired goal or fulfilling a perceived need. For example, when someone's input is ignored in a discussion, it can lead to feelings of frustration. Conflict, however, arises from opposing interests, goals, or actions. Conflicts can take various forms based on the nature of these opposing desires or goals.
One common type of conflict is the Approach–Approach Conflict. In this case, a person faces two desirable...
47
Frustration and Conflict: Avoidance-Avoidance, Double-Approach Avoidance01:14

Frustration and Conflict: Avoidance-Avoidance, Double-Approach Avoidance

59
Avoidance-avoidance conflict refers to a psychological situation where a person must choose between two or more unpleasant alternatives. These conflicts are particularly stressful because neither option is desirable. This dilemma is often expressed in sayings like "caught between a rock and a hard place" or "between the devil and the deep blue sea." For instance, individuals who fear dental procedures may find themselves torn between enduring a painful toothache or facing the...
59
Robbers Cave04:49

Robbers Cave

14.3K
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...
14.3K
Self-Discrepancy Theory02:45

Self-Discrepancy Theory

18.3K
One influential perspective on what motivates people's behavior is detailed in Tory Higgin's self-discrepancy theory (Higgins, 1987). He proposed that people hold disagreeing internal representations of themselves that lead to different emotional states.  
18.3K
Cognitive Dissonance01:38

Cognitive Dissonance

32.5K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
32.5K
Relationship Formation02:12

Relationship Formation

39.8K
What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
39.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Compatibility Effects With Simple Lever Tools: A Replication and Extension Beyond Simple Button Responses.

Human factors·2026
Same author

Is multitasking efficient? Different metrics, different conclusions.

Psychological research·2026
Same author

An attempt to replicate action-effect learning and its generalization without stimulus-stimulus learning.

Psychological research·2026
Same author

Ten years Diffusion Model for Conflict (DMC) tasks: Theoretical foundations, applications, practical recommendations, and open challenges.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same author

The role of time in action control: Evidence against anticipation of action-effect intervals and a possible motivational account for delayed-effect costs.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2025
Same author

The time course of task 2 response activation in dual-tasking: Modeling results, interindividual differences, and practical recommendations.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2025
Same journal

Mind wandering during first- and foreign-language reading.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Lexical word processing is unaffected by rapid invisible frequency tagging in reading: Evidence from eye movements.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Anxiety modulates voluntary attentional orienting to emotional gaze cues: Eye movements for pro- and anti-saccades.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Faster key-press responses to front vowels than back vowels when matching heard vowels with represented vowels.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Testing the interleaving effect without response bias: A forced-choice reevaluation of Kornell and Bjork (2008).

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

The impact of social interaction on abstract concepts.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 9, 2025

A Conflict Model of Reward-seeking Behavior in Male Rats
06:11

A Conflict Model of Reward-seeking Behavior in Male Rats

Published on: February 20, 2019

7.4K

A comment on the Revised Diffusion Model for Conflict tasks (RDMC).

Markus Janczyk1, Ian Grant Mackenzie2, Valentin Koob3

  • 1Psychological Research Methods and Cognitive Psychology, Department of Psychology, University of Bremen, Hochschulring 18, D-28359, Bremen, Germany. janczyk@uni-bremen.de.

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
|October 24, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The Revised Diffusion Model for Conflict tasks (RDMC) is questioned for its assumptions and parameter recovery, suggesting it is not yet a viable revision of the original Diffusion Model for Conflict tasks (DMC). Further research is needed to validate RDMC in cognitive conflict research.

Keywords:
DecayDiffusion Model for Conflict tasksDiffusion modelInhibitionParameter recovery

More Related Videos

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
06:45

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Published on: April 18, 2017

6.2K
RBDT: A Computerized Task System based in Transposition for the Continuous Analysis of Relational Behavior Dynamics in Humans
11:09

RBDT: A Computerized Task System based in Transposition for the Continuous Analysis of Relational Behavior Dynamics in Humans

Published on: July 17, 2021

3.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 9, 2025

A Conflict Model of Reward-seeking Behavior in Male Rats
06:11

A Conflict Model of Reward-seeking Behavior in Male Rats

Published on: February 20, 2019

7.4K
Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
06:45

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Published on: April 18, 2017

6.2K
RBDT: A Computerized Task System based in Transposition for the Continuous Analysis of Relational Behavior Dynamics in Humans
11:09

RBDT: A Computerized Task System based in Transposition for the Continuous Analysis of Relational Behavior Dynamics in Humans

Published on: July 17, 2021

3.0K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Computational Neuroscience

Background:

  • Conflict tasks (Simon, Eriksen flanker, Stroop) involve processing relevant and irrelevant stimuli.
  • The congruency effect shows faster, more accurate responses in congruent vs. incongruent trials.
  • Distributional analyses reveal task-specific patterns in how congruency effects change with response times (RTs).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the Revised Diffusion Model for Conflict tasks (RDMC) against the original Diffusion Model for Conflict tasks (DMC).
  • To address specific assumptions and parameter recovery issues within the RDMC framework.
  • To clarify the theoretical standing of RDMC in explaining cognitive conflict.

Main Methods:

  • Theoretical evaluation of RDMC's assumptions regarding pulse-like activation and parameter differences between trial types.
  • Empirical assessment via a parameter recovery study comparing RDMC and DMC.
  • Analysis of distributional properties of the congruency effect in conflict tasks.

Main Results:

  • The pulse-like activation function in DMC is deemed plausible, contrary to RDMC's critique.
  • RDMC introduces questionable assumptions about separate parameters for congruent and incongruent trials.
  • Parameter recovery simulations indicate RDMC's limitations, particularly in parameter estimation compared to DMC.

Conclusions:

  • RDMC faces significant theoretical and empirical challenges, questioning its status as a revised model.
  • DMC provides a more robust framework for understanding distributional properties of the congruency effect.
  • Further refinement and validation are necessary for RDMC to be considered a viable alternative to DMC.