Does the interface between individual 3D acetabular implants and host bone influence the functional outcomes in...

There is a wide range of commercially produced revision implants for adequate reconstruction of acetabular large bone defects today, however, it is not always possible to achieve long-term survival of these implants. There is an increasing number of scientific publications concerning the use of custom-designed 3D components, which make it possible not only to achieve stable fixation and connect the pelvic bones but also to restore hip joint biomechanics.

To evaluate the positioning of 3D acetabular implants after revision hip arthroplasty and its impact on clinical and functional outcomes.

we analyzed results in 48 patients with bone defect types IIIA and IIIB Paprosky types, after revision hip arthroplasty. A prospective study was conducted from 2017 to 2023. Revision arthroplasty due to aseptic loosening of the components was performed in 30 cases and as a second stage of periprosthetic infection treatment in 18 cases.

We did not achieve a statistically significant difference when using additional flanges and clinical and functional results. In 2 cases we faced aseptic loosening in patients using flanges. In no case were we able to install an implant with 100% adherence to porous structure compared to preoperatively planned adherence. According to the WOMAC and VAS scales, increasing the contact area of the components showed a slight statistical difference in the improvement of clinical and functional results and the reduction of pain.

When acetabular 3D components adhered to the bone by more than 68%, we did not register a single complication in the postoperative period, and acetabular 3D components adhered to the bone by less than 68%, a total of 8 (16.6%) complications were registered.