Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 9, 2025

08:05
Design and Analysis for Fall Detection System Simplification
Published on: April 6, 2020
10.6K
Asynchronous Control for Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Nonhomogeneous Markov Jump Systems Against Successive DoS Attacks
IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics
|October 25, 2024
Summary
This study addresses asynchronous control for Interval Type-2 fuzzy nonhomogeneous Markov jump systems facing denial-of-service attacks. A novel fuzzy asynchronous controller ensures system stability despite successive attacks and transmission delays.
Area of Science:
- Control Systems Engineering
- Fuzzy Logic Systems
- Cybersecurity
Background:
- Nonhomogeneous Markov jump systems are susceptible to denial-of-service (DoS) attacks.
- Asynchronous control is crucial for maintaining system performance under intermittent communication.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop an asynchronous control strategy for Interval Type-2 fuzzy nonhomogeneous Markov jump systems under successive DoS attacks.
- To address imperfect premise matching and transmission delays in the control design.
Main Methods:
- Construction of a fuzzy asynchronous controller using a hidden Markov model.
- Development of a delay closed-loop system incorporating stochastic transmission delays.
- Derivation of stability criteria using linear matrix inequalities and Lyapunov functional approach.
Main Results:
- Stability criteria for the closed-loop system were successfully derived.
- Conditions for the existence of the fuzzy controller were established.
- The proposed control scheme demonstrated feasibility and effectiveness through simulations.
Conclusions:
- The developed fuzzy asynchronous control strategy effectively enhances the resilience of Interval Type-2 fuzzy nonhomogeneous Markov jump systems against DoS attacks.
- The method provides a robust framework for designing controllers under challenging communication constraints and cyber threats.
Related Concept Videos
BIBO stability of continuous and discrete -time systems
353
System stability is a fundamental concept in signal processing, often assessed using convolution. For a system to be considered bounded-input bounded-output (BIBO) stable, any bounded input signal must produce a bounded output signal. A bounded input signal is one where the modulus does not exceed a certain constant at any point in time.
To determine the BIBO stability, the convolution integral is utilized when a bounded continuous-time input is applied to a Linear Time-Invariant (LTI) system....
To determine the BIBO stability, the convolution integral is utilized when a bounded continuous-time input is applied to a Linear Time-Invariant (LTI) system....
353
Linear time-invariant Systems
221
A system is linear if it displays the characteristics of homogeneity and additivity, together termed the superposition property. This principle is fundamental in all linear systems. Linear time-invariant (LTI) systems include systems with linear elements and constant parameters.
The input-output behavior of an LTI system can be fully defined by its response to an impulsive excitation at its input. Once this impulse response is known, the system's reaction to any other input can be...
The input-output behavior of an LTI system can be fully defined by its response to an impulsive excitation at its input. Once this impulse response is known, the system's reaction to any other input can be...
221
Time-Domain Interpretation of PD Control
84
Proportional-Derivative (PD) control is a widely used control method in various engineering systems to enhance stability and performance. In a system with only proportional control, common issues include high maximum overshoot and oscillation, observed in both the error signal and its rate of change. This behavior can be divided into three distinct phases: initial overshoot, subsequent undershoot, and gradual stabilization.
Consider the example of control of motor torque. Initially, a positive...
Consider the example of control of motor torque. Initially, a positive...
84
Feedback control systems
292
Feedback control systems are categorized in various ways based on their design, analysis, and signal types.
Linear feedback systems are theoretical models that simplify analysis and design. These systems operate under the principle that their output is directly proportional to their input within certain ranges. For instance, an amplifier in a control system behaves linearly as long as the input signal remains within a specific range. However, most physical systems exhibit inherent nonlinearity...
Linear feedback systems are theoretical models that simplify analysis and design. These systems operate under the principle that their output is directly proportional to their input within certain ranges. For instance, an amplifier in a control system behaves linearly as long as the input signal remains within a specific range. However, most physical systems exhibit inherent nonlinearity...
292
Control System Problem
109
In an open-loop system, such as a basic thermostat, the poles of the transfer function influence the system's response but do not determine its stability. However, when feedback is introduced to form a closed-loop system, such as an advanced thermostat that adjusts heating based on room temperature, stability is governed by the new poles of the closed-loop transfer function.
When forming a closed-loop system, issues can arise if the poles cross into the unstable region, leading to potential...
When forming a closed-loop system, issues can arise if the poles cross into the unstable region, leading to potential...
109
Transfer Function in Control Systems
371
The transfer function is a fundamental concept in the analysis and design of linear time-invariant (LTI) systems. It offers a concise way to understand how a system responds to different inputs in the frequency domain. It serves as a bridge between the time-domain differential equations that describe system dynamics and the frequency-domain representation that facilitates easier manipulation and analysis.
To derive the transfer function, consider a general nth-order linear time-invariant...
To derive the transfer function, consider a general nth-order linear time-invariant...
371

