Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 9, 2025

Author Spotlight: AI-Driven Trypanosome Species Detection from Microscopic Images
Published on: October 27, 2023
Exploring Stakeholder Perceptions about Using Artificial Intelligence for the Diagnosis of Rare and Atypical
Aysun Tekin1, Svetlana Herasevich2, Sarah A Minteer3
1Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States.
Objectives:
This study aimed to evaluate critical care provider perspectives about diagnostic practices for rare and atypical infections and the potential for using artificial intelligence (AI) as a decision support system (DSS).
Methods:
We conducted an anonymous web-based survey among critical care providers at Mayo Clinic Rochester between November 25, 2023, and January 15, 2024, to evaluate their experience with rare and atypical infection diagnostic processes and AI-based DSSs. We also assessed the perceived usefulness of AI-based DSSs, their potential impact on improving diagnostic practices for rare and atypical infections, and the perceived risks and benefits of their use.
Results:
A total of 47/143 providers completed the survey. Thirty-eight out of 47 agreed that there was a delay in diagnosing rare and atypical infections. Among those who agreed, limited assessment of specific patient factors and failure to consider them were the most frequently cited important contributing factors (33/38). Thirty-eight out of 47 reported familiarity with the AI-based DSS applications available to critical care providers. Less than half (18/38) thought AI-based DSSs often provided valuable insights into patient care, but almost three-quarters (34/47) thought AI-based DDSs often provided valuable insight when specifically asked about their ability to improve the diagnosis of rare and atypical infections. All respondents rated reliability as important in enhancing the perceived utility of AI-based DSSs (47/47) and almost all rated interpretability and integration into the workflow as important (45/47). The primary concern about implementing an AI-based DSS in this context was alert fatigue (44/47).
Conclusion:
Most critical care providers perceive that there are delays in diagnosing rare infections, indicating inadequate assessment and consideration of the diagnosis as the major contributors. Reliability, interpretability, workflow integration, and alert fatigue emerged as key factors impacting the usability of AI-based DSS. These findings will inform the development and implementation of an AI-based diagnostic algorithm to aid in identifying rare and atypical infections.
Related Concept Videos
Issues And Trends In Healthcare Delivery System
Cost Containment
Payment for healthcare services has historically promoted adoption of costly and often unnecessary or inefficient...
Documentation of Nursing Diagnosis
In some settings, data-driven computerized decision support systems are in place, allowing for more accurate nursing diagnoses. The database within one of these systems includes diagnostic labels defining characteristics, activities, and indicators for nursing. A nurse enters...
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Steps in Outbreak Investigation
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value
Sensitivity is the...
Pneumonia III: Complications and Assessment

